That might be correct. But, even if he said there were no allegations, he might be correct in the sense that the article says levels were high and the board needed to discuss that w/ the Furies. Seems to be typical of these situations where they flag for potential violation and give the athlete a chance to explain if there's a legit reason before declaring it an actual violation. In other words, they may have not alleged cheating yet, since they're waiting on an explanation.
In MMA this happens monthly and it's always reported that a fighter was "flagged for potential violation", but details are kept under wraps until the fighter is able to respond and the test deemed the result of a violation.
In MMA this happens monthly and it's always reported that a fighter was "flagged for potential violation", but details are kept under wraps until the fighter is able to respond and the test deemed the result of a violation.
Comment