Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lil G fighting his 3rd prospect in 4 fights

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Eastlos View Post
    WTF, this coward should be called out for fighting his 3rd prospect in his last 4 fights (Monroe, Wade & Eubanks)... Isn't Lil G a champ? How many 35 yrs old CHAMPS are still fighting prospects at that age... This is unacceptable instead of fighting a fellow champ in Lara he chooses to fight another up n comer what a joke
    Monroe and Wade were pretty bad but Eubank is not a prospect, he is a genuine title challenger.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Derranged View Post
      For fucks sake you're dumb. I never said Eubank was a better fighter. I'm not a Golovtard making excuses. Anyone with a brain can see the sad state of affairs in the middleweight and super middleweight divisions and boxing in general.

      And at Nelo telling him to kick rocks. He ducks a fight with GGG, gives up his belt, moves back down to 154 and then you complain that "lil g is scared of a good fight". You're a fucking idiot troll and I am now dumber having argued with you.
      An yet you where assuming I would diminish Lil G win if he where to beat Lara... If anything I would respect him for taking the fight. You say you ain't a Lil G fanboy but you try to justify his decision not to fight Lara b/c people wouldn't give him credit... C'mon stop making excuses this isn't about Canelo this is about Lil G getting an opportunity to fight a fellow champ but chooses to fight a prospect instead no excuses this bum is all talk

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by soul_survivor View Post
        Monroe and Wade were pretty bad but Eubank is not a prospect, he is a genuine title challenger.
        Eubanks ain't even a contender... The kid fought Saunders and lost what makes you thing he's a genuine title challenger?

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Eastlos View Post
          An yet you where assuming I would diminish Lil G win if he where to beat Lara... If anything I would respect him for taking the fight. You say you ain't a Lil G fanboy but you try to justify his decision not to fight Lara b/c people wouldn't give him credit... C'mon stop making excuses this isn't about Canelo this is about Lil G getting an opportunity to fight a fellow champ but chooses to fight a prospect instead no excuses this bum is all talk
          I would have no problem with a Lara fight, I'm just saying I don't think its all that good considering he never fought at middleweight. But I've said and still do to this day, that if a Canelo/Saunders/Jacobs fight can't happen yet, make the Lara fight.

          Comment


          • #15
            Eubank Jr is going to beat Lil G ass. Might be Eubank Jr Canelo next fall. Don't be surprised, I sure wouldn't.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Derranged View Post
              I would have no problem with a Lara fight, I'm just saying I don't think its all that good considering he never fought at middleweight. But I've said and still do to this day, that if a Canelo/Saunders/Jacobs fight can't happen yet, make the Lara fight.
              Good at least you agree Lil G shouldn't be fighting prospects at his age anymore. Time for him to accept a real challenge and fight Lara how anyone would rather see him fight Eubanks over a legitimate name in Lara is a joke and just shows how big of fanboys they really are

              Comment


              • #17
                Oh we wa wa wa Golovkin might be fighting Eubanks. Monroe was available when Cotto ducked him. Wade was his mandatory (at least he still takes those rights unlike Strum (Ducked Golovkin WBA) Geale (Ducked Golovkin WBA) Martinez (Ducked Golovkin WBC) Cotto (Ducked Golovkin WBC) Canelo (Ducked Golovkin WBC)). Funny how all those guys ducking him is Golovkins fault. Jacobs is going to duck him even though Jacobs is the WBA mandatory and Saunders the WBO champion won't fight him. So you think that Lara should fight him? Based on what exactly? Who has he beaten to get a shot? Has any of the governing bodies made him a mandatory? Nope. And when Golovkin wipes the floor with Lara because be honest you as a fan don't honestly think he can win, will say that oh look lil g only fights smaller guy. Get off of your sanctamonious a#$ and come to reality. The only champ with Balls was Lemieux because he stepped up when Golovkin was his mandatory.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Eastlos View Post
                  Eubanks ain't even a contender... The kid fought Saunders and lost what makes you thing he's a genuine title challenger?
                  He lost a close decision to a current world title holder and since then has gone on to win the British title, which is the traditional route to becoming a challenger on the world stage.

                  A win over Jacobs would have solidified his status as a challenger but he is bypassing that for a shot at THE GUY. I can't hold that against Eubank or GGG for taking the fight.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    GGG haters surely are clever and well educated.

                    Crazy that people like this are even allowed on this forum.

                    Sad to see such losers on this site.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Derranged View Post
                      I would have no problem with a Lara fight, I'm just saying I don't think its all that good considering he never fought at middleweight. But I've said and still do to this day, that if a Canelo/Saunders/Jacobs fight can't happen yet, make the Lara fight.
                      Lara did fight Canelo at 155. If that makes Canelo a MW it makes Lara one too.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP