Comments Thread For: Peter Fury Reacts To Hearn Over 'Crazy' Joshua-Fury Comments

[REMOVE SHARK 55]

You better break into your piggy bank and stack your money up...becauee I'm gonna come and get it...anyway we haven't discussed how we're gonna do this...Western Union ? Or can we meet up and bet. ... It's a straight bet geezer...no 2-1 or anything ..you have fury ihave AJ ...what stake u want ?

Even money bet.

If you have a Bookmakers account with Bet365, Bet Victor or Coral I can arrange for the funds to be in your account within two minutes if you simply PM username. AJ would have to be victorious for that to happen.

If you don't have an account with them I'll use Western Union but any fees I'll have to pay will come out your winnings. And yourself?

Did we not agree on £300 a few months back?

I hope I'm not breaking any rules moderators, if I message me and don't ban me please.

[kafkod]

Even at 16 fights he certainly can beat fury and I have no doubt what so ever...as for wilder more than likely and haye could cause problems for joshua early but if it's gos beyond 5 rounds haye gets warn down and stopped.....just go's to show that joshua could walk right through chisora and the likes of helenius without breaking sweat, yes joshua do need more experience but could he deal with fury with what he has..100%....and in 16 fights and under 4 years as achieved as much as fury in 8 years and 25 fights.....levels son but your see it when this fight gets made....fury go's over when he faces joshua

That's complete bollocks. Fury beat the undisputed No1 HW in the world, away from home, and won 4 world title belts, if you include the Ring lineal.

AJ then picked up one of those belts in a home fight against another novice, after it was stripped from Fury because he rematched Wlad.

Only a biased fanboy would say that AJ's win over Martin equalled what Fury achieved against Wlad.

[Reverb]

B. Hearn was around a young Lewis when he began his career as a pro and watched him grow . He claims Joshua when at 15 fights is better skilled thsn Lewis was and hits harder ,he would have a good indication bc i believe he was Lewis management /promoter of some sort back in the day . I would agree ,Lewis wasnt as athletic as Joshua and he said if Joshua fought Lewis even with just 15 fights he would win , i would probably tend to agree being Joshua is taller than Lewis and would force an inside fight that would nullify the Lewis jab . Point being Joshua is that good any way you look at it , thats why nobody has taken you up on thst bet and only someone who is not as cerebral watching boxing would .

As most like to ignore in this forum ,theres a reason AJ is favored over anyone but Wlad which is 50/50 I think, nothing remotely crazy about those statements by Hearn more sour g****s by the fury family,remeber these guys praised Martins skills over AJ's !

Lewis had a lot more facets on show at this point than Joshua has shown so far.

[petero]

That's complete bollocks. Fury beat the undisputed No1 HW in the world, away from home, and won 4 world title belts, if you include the Ring lineal.

AJ then picked up one of those belts in a home fight against another novice, after it was stripped from Fury because he rematched Wlad.

Only a biased fanboy would say that AJ's win over Martin equalled what Fury achieved against Wlad.

Yes, thank you for explaining this to toilet plunger. This guy is swinging on AJ's nuttsack, pathetic

[kiDynamite92]

B. Hearn was around a young Lewis when he began his career as a pro and watched him grow . He claims Joshua when at 15 fights is better skilled thsn Lewis was and hits harder ,he would have a good indication bc i believe he was Lewis management /promoter of some sort back in the day . I would agree ,Lewis wasnt as athletic as Joshua and he said if Joshua fought Lewis even with just 15 fights he would win , i would probably tend to agree being Joshua is taller than Lewis and would force an inside fight that would nullify the Lewis jab . Point being Joshua is that good any way you look at it , thats why nobody has taken you up on thst bet and only someone who is not as cerebral watching boxing would .

As most like to ignore in this forum ,theres a reason AJ is favored over anyone but Wlad which is 50/50 I think, nothing remotely crazy about those statements by Hearn more sour g****s by the fury family,remeber these guys praised Martins skills over AJ's !

Are you saying that AJ at 15 fights could have beaten Lennox Lewis at his absolute best?

[juggernaut666]

Are you saying that AJ at 15 fights could have beaten Lennox Lewis at his absolute best?

If we are talking about the same Lewis who was rocked in the first round by an aggressive Briggs in round one....yes he absolutely could. the comparison was that of the same number of fights. I also didn't claim anything that was the guy who knew lewis best and has been around both Joshua and Lewis,so once again VALID points always wins in the end whether you agree or not.

[REMOVE SHARK 55]

Take that fools money. He wanted evens with me when I said Fury beats AJ by KO! Having a laugh ain't he? I'll get around 3-1 or better at the bookies if Eddie gets a testicle transplant and makes the fight happen.

Even money for the KO?? He's definitely having a bubble. Notice in all my posting I haven't said a negative word about AJ. I just personally believe he'll lose a lopsided 12 round to Fury. I'm willing to put the Sterling where my mouth is and I'm not afraid of being wrong. Can I say the same for others?

Constantly raving about him as if he's some type of demigod. In the words of AJ, "levels"!.

In other news, StevePlunger still hasn't replied.

[REMOVE SHARK 55]

If we are talking about the same Lewis who was rocked in the first round by an aggressive Briggs in round one....yes he absolutely could. the comparison was that of the same number of fights. I also didn't claim anything that was the guy who knew lewis best and has been around both Joshua and Lewis,so once again VALID points always wins in the end whether you agree or not.

It would be a good fight between the two. Don't get caught up in promoter jargon he is only protecting his current commodity. It us that get caught up in the cross fire.

Don't forget Frank Maloney split up with Warren around the times you're talking about. Maloney also oversaw the rest of Lennox Lewis career from that point onwards. Do you think Barry Hearn has a favourable view of Lewis?.

[juggernaut666]

It would be a good fight between the two. Don't get caught up in promoter jargon he is only protecting his current commodity. It us that get caught up in the cross fire.

Don't forget Frank Maloney split up with Warren around the times you're talking about. Maloney also oversaw the rest of Lennox Lewis career from that point onwards. Do you think Barry Hearn has a favourable view of Lewis?.

I see no reason why he has any to gain stating Joshua to be better than lewis...the vid below is even earlier remarks when Joshua had 8 fights. I only need to see skill sets which why I believe fury is not going to do well by the time he fights Joshua ,that is one fight im sure of if I had to bet. I wouldn't jump on that plunger bet if you are thinking putting big bucks on it,also consider Fury admits Joshua did get the better of him already and improves more than fury does even going 3 rounds on average. you are talking two different types of abilities here,if you combined mike Tyson with Lennox lewis you would get a hybrid fighter like Joshua, Furys reach would not be that great to a 6'6 82 inch reach guy and as stated Joshua will /could pressure him eventually getting on the inside landing those huge uppercut /body pounding shots from hell. you guys are severly underestimating him.


On Lewis....I would favor Joshua b/c I favor a prime Tyson over Lewis and AJ wouldn't have to work nearly as hard to get to Lewis.,and AJ throws faster combos than Lewis ever did,his one weakness is he pauses at times when landing power shots as if hes waiting for the other guy to quit or fall. of course put a side bet with plunger but I would not venture the big $$$ on that one.

[REMOVE SHARK 55]

I see no reason why he has any to gain stating Joshua to be better than lewis...the vid below is even earlier remarks when Joshua had 8 fights. I only need to see skill sets which why I believe fury is not going to do well by the time he fights Joshua ,that is one fight im sure of if I had to bet. I wouldn't jump on that plunger bet if you are thinking putting big bucks on it,also consider Fury admits Joshua did get the better of him already and improves more than fury does even going 3 rounds on average. you are talking two different types of abilities here,if you combined mike Tyson with Lennox lewis you would get a hybrid fighter like Joshua, Furys reach would not be that great to a 6'6 82 inch reach guy and as stated Joshua will /could pressure him eventually getting on the inside landing those huge uppercut /body pounding shots from hell. you guys are severly underestimating him.


On Lewis....I would favor Joshua b/c I favor a prime Tyson over Lewis and AJ wouldn't have to work nearly as hard to get to Lewis.,and AJ throws faster combos than Lewis ever did,his one weakness is he pauses at times when landing power shots as if hes waiting for the other guy to quit or fall. of course put a side bet with plunger but I would not venture the big $$$ on that one.

I jumped the gun with the naughty step comment at you I apologise for that. I was thinking of hindsight, Lennox as a full package, the last undisputed champion. If we are talking about a fight between 15-0 versions, then I myself would lean to Josh.

Me and Plungers bet is fate. I feel Fury is the under rated one. I'm actually more afraid of the upcoming Wlad fight than any pending fights with AJ or Wilder.