Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Peter Fury Reacts To Hearn Over 'Crazy' Joshua-Fury Comments

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Andre Wardttke View Post
    *Barry Hearn not Eddie
    I stand corrected and I owe Eddie Hearn an apology!

    But not that **** Steve Plunger. Lol.

    Comment


    • #12
      "If the real Klitschko shows up" He did show up and couldn't land a glove on Fury because he has real boxing skills. Fury feinted Wlad right out of his boots. To all the haters, Fury is the LINEAL H.W. champion of the WORLD.
      Ring magazine belt and all.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Steve plunger View Post
        Who exactly has fury boxed besides klitchcko and that being said a 40 year old past his prime klitckco.....helenium ? Chisora ? Abell or a cruiserweight cunningham lol...and hearn is right saying petting dropped by a fighter you outweigh by 50lbs shows serious issues there..... Fury lets just hope you best klitchcko in the rematch so the joshua fight can be made and this charade ....joshua knocks fury out inside 9 rounds and who want's to bet me
        Just get my money ready and stop waffling.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by juggernaut666 View Post
          B. Hearn was around a young Lewis when he began his career as a pro and watched him grow . He claims Joshua when at 15 fights is better skilled thsn Lewis was and hits harder ,he would have a good indication bc i believe he was Lewis management /promoter of some sort back in the day . I would agree ,Lewis wasnt as athletic as Joshua and he said if Joshua fought Lewis even with just 15 fights he would win , i would probably tend to agree being Joshua is taller than Lewis and would force an inside fight that would nullify the Lewis jab . Point being Joshua is that good any way you look at it , thats why nobody has taken you up on thst bet and only someone who is not as cerebral watching boxing would .

          As most like to ignore in this forum ,theres a reason AJ is favored over anyone but Wlad which is 50/50 I think, nothing remotely crazy about those statements by Hearn more sour g****s by the fury family,remeber these guys praised Martins skills over AJ's !
          You're wrong. Me and steveplunger have a bet so don't make it something that it's not.

          Regarding your Lewis comments, go and sit on the naughty step

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by kafkod View Post
            A promoter talking **** about about a world champion like that is something that should never happen in boxing.

            That white collar money man Hearn isn't going to take a single punch or shed one drop of sweat in the ring.
            The Hearn-family is an idiot-family, seriously. But the biggest idiots get the biggest potatoes, Eddie hearn can be happy that he got Joshua.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by kafkod View Post
              You should tell that to Eddie Hearn. He's saying his 16 fight novice is the best HW in the world RIGHT NOW.
              Even at 16 fights he certainly can beat fury and I have no doubt what so ever...as for wilder more than likely and haye could cause problems for joshua early but if it's gos beyond 5 rounds haye gets warn down and stopped.....just go's to show that joshua could walk right through chisora and the likes of helenius without breaking sweat, yes joshua do need more experience but could he deal with fury with what he has..100%....and in 16 fights and under 4 years as achieved as much as fury in 8 years and 25 fights.....levels son but your see it when this fight gets made....fury go's over when he faces joshua
              Last edited by The plunger man; 06-21-2016, 04:58 PM.

              Comment


              • #17
                Wilder is struggling to get a name. Josh v wilder makes sense.
                Winner gets fury

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by StudentOfDaGame View Post
                  Just get my money ready and stop waffling.
                  You better break into your piggy bank and stack your money up...becauee I'm gonna come and get it...anyway we haven't discussed how we're gonna do this...Western Union ? Or can we meet up and bet. ... It's a straight bet geezer...no 2-1 or anything ..you have fury ihave AJ ...what stake u want ?

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Steve plunger View Post
                    Who exactly has fury boxed besides klitchcko and that being said a 40 year old past his prime klitckco.....helenium ? Chisora ? Abell or a cruiserweight cunningham lol...and hearn is right saying petting dropped by a fighter you outweigh by 50lbs shows serious issues there..... Fury lets just hope you best klitchcko in the rematch so the joshua fight can be made and this charade ....joshua knocks fury out inside 9 rounds and who want's to bet me
                    That's long been my argument, even as someone who has followed Fury for years. He's looked average against below average guys. That said, I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt pending a definitive Klitschko win. If he wins the rematch, then full credit to him, whether Wlad is aged or not.
                    And, Joshua has done nothing so far other than looked sharp against nobodies so I can't rank him above Fury right now (though I do think Joshua beats Fury).

                    Every time I post something like this, Fury fans freak out on me.
                    Last edited by Redd Foxx; 06-21-2016, 05:19 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Redd Foxx View Post
                      That's long been my argument, even as someone who has followed Fury for years. He's looked average against below average guys. That said, I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt pending a definitive Klitschko win. If he wins the rematch, then full credit to him, whether Wlad is aged or not.
                      And, Joshua has done nothing so far other than looked sharp against nobodies so I can't rank him above Fury right now (though I do think Joshua beats Fury).

                      Every time I post something like this, Fory fans freak out on me.
                      Lol I get the same replies but don't worry it about fella...there a bunch of over zealous fury followers who I personally think are clueless when it comes to boxing and I also agree mate you cannot rank joshua above fury because fury beat klitchcko so he deserves that ranking but that doesn't mean that joshua cannot best fury it just means he's not had the chance to face him yet and prove it...but it will happen pretty soon and then the argument is settled.....i think that wilder would also beat fury...quick and powerful rangy puncher who will lets his hands fly......don't write klitchcko in tha rematch as well ...respect

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP