Comments Thread For: Jarrell Miller: Nobody Gives a **** About Wilder vs. Arreola!

[soul_survivor]

I dunno who this Miller fool is but he is spot on.

[sicko]

Agree with him 1000% it is a **** Fight!

[IRONCHINHAGLER]

Agree.....duhappas,Molina,spitzka,arreola- true "bum squad". Pathetic run of fights since winning title!

[LOCOMEX89]

This is a tough fight to sell because we all already know the outcome. Wilder is going to smash Arreola within 5 rounds.

This Jarrell Miller is something else. Hopefully he gets a real test by the end of the year.

[saintpat]

Who? Never heard of him.

[uniquehump]

Well, at least he didn't say, "Wilder should fight a fighter with some name recognition, like myself".

[DeeMoney]

Wilder scheduled Povetkin, ducked nobody but scheduled a legit top 10 opponent (an opponent who subsequently FAILED a drug test). But how bad is the hatred and schadenfreude towards Wilder, people actually blame him for not fighting Povetkin.

So what does Wilder do, schedules a stay busy fight. You know, because so many people with belts fight extra matches that they don't have to; and now he is hated for that. Would people rather he just not fight at all. Welcome to the internet though.

As for Miller, Areola is better than anyone he has fought. Moreover, this is the same Miller that said he would break Anthony Joshua's jaw; but boxing politics makes strange bedfellows, as AJ fans seem to defend Miller.

[uniquehump]

trace was from months ago when it was legal...

Povetkin didn't cheat Wilder wanted an excuse to duck

QuackQuackQuack!!!

Why are people still saying that it was trace from when it was legal? Unless you are joking or I've been reading the stories wrong. Either or, it doesn't really matter to me, but my understanding is that he tested negative the 1st time and then he took another test and tested negative again and then took a 3rd test, which came back positive. Now if he would of tested positive during the 1st test, then there is a plausible reason to say that it was trace from when it was legal and then they could continue to test to see if the levels dropped. But he tested negative the 1st two times and then the 3rd test came back positive. If I've read it wrong, my apologies. And if someone can explain this scenario to me to help me and anyone else to understand how can trace be found in the 3rd test and not the 1st two, then let us all know.

[Mooshashi]

Well at least it will be a cheap PPV....maybe only $99.00....$109.00 HD. In HD
you can really see Arreola's man boobs flop around, so no need for the HD.

[fourtheboys96]

Blaming Povetkin for the cancellation of the fight against Wilder? Fine.

But blaming Povetkin for Wilder's choice of opponent? What?

The only conclusion I can discern from this is that Wilder will fight a good fighter only if it is a mandatory. But he wont challenge himself if not forced to.