Comments Thread For: Ryabinsky Intent To Clear Povetkin, Reschedule Wilder Bout

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BostonGuy
    Emeritus Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 13343
    • 2,119
    • 6,833
    • 900,690,265

    #41
    Originally posted by Weltschmerz
    Hopefully the WBC will eventually come forward with a justified ruling and setting a new date for the fight.
    Yes, we need the WBC to come out with their own independent ruling on all this. We've heard from both camps, now the WBC has got to step up and clarify this mess.

    Comment

    • SUBZER0ED
      Be water, my friend.
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Feb 2013
      • 11207
      • 2,482
      • 1,879
      • 34,667

      #42
      All legal & scientific guessing hoo ha aside, Povetkin should either be cleared to fight Wilder in the near future, or serve the required suspension & then schedule to fight Wilder later. No way should this fight be permanently called off if Povetkin meets the requirements.

      Comment

      • Weltschmerz
        Sehnsucht
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2010
        • 16546
        • 698
        • 1,622
        • 27,699

        #43
        Originally posted by BostonGuy
        Yes, we need the WBC to come out with their own independent ruling on all this. We've heard from both camps, now the WBC has got to step up and clarify this mess.
        Their decision probably comes following another VADA declaration about the specific case (or following communications between the WBC and VADA). It hasn't been made clear what exactly this 'investigation' is; Ryabinsky has come forward with a statement that he believes it will take 'a couple of months' or so.

        I think it's fair if they reschedule the fight for later this year, and keep the VADA testing going in the meantime, of course.

        Comment

        • Fetta
          nob cheese
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2011
          • 16696
          • 417
          • 3
          • 24,315

          #44
          Originally posted by hhs661
          B Sample.. TEST IT!!!
          They di and it was positive. Im almost certain he tried to microdose and got caught

          Also I think I read that even though he result was trace it was still a failed cause WADA considers it a fail AFTER March 1 which this was in April and the end of April and after 3 cleared.

          He doped

          Comment

          • SUBZER0ED
            Be water, my friend.
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Feb 2013
            • 11207
            • 2,482
            • 1,879
            • 34,667

            #45
            Originally posted by Fetta
            They di and it was positive. Im almost certain he tried to microdose and got caught
            Also I think I read that even though he result was trace it was still a failed cause WADA considers it a fail AFTER March 1 which this was in April and the end of April and after 3 cleared.

            He doped
            I thought microdosing was practiced so that users wouldn't get caught, because the drug would be virtually undetectable within hours?

            Comment

            • Fetta
              nob cheese
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2011
              • 16696
              • 417
              • 3
              • 24,315

              #46
              Originally posted by SUBZER0ED
              I thought microdosing was practiced so that users wouldn't get caught, because the drug would be virtually undetectable within hours?
              Thats why i been saying that after this heads were rolling

              Comment

              • hhs661
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Mar 2010
                • 6467
                • 409
                • 417
                • 20,927

                #47
                Originally posted by Fetta
                They di and it was positive. Im almost certain he tried to microdose and got caught

                Also I think I read that even though he result was trace it was still a failed cause WADA considers it a fail AFTER March 1 which this was in April and the end of April and after 3 cleared.

                He doped

                [IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/AxVvjX7eSu1xrozbt6/*****.gif[/IMG]

                Comment

                • {Darko}
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 339
                  • 42
                  • 31
                  • 6,579

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Eff Pandas
                  I anxiously await some lame evidence Povetkin is innocent. Testing clean 3 times & coming up dirty a 4th time is a steep hill to climb towards innocence in this situation.

                  If there is any legit respectable thing happening with this Povetkin will get suspended for 6+ months & they could potentially put on this fight at the end of the year or around this time next year assuming the WBC keeps his ranking which they may or may not do & the longer the suspension the more likely he loses his ranking.
                  Originally posted by Fetta
                  They di and it was positive. Im almost certain he tried to microdose and got caught

                  Also I think I read that even though he result was trace it was still a failed cause WADA considers it a fail AFTER March 1 which this was in April and the end of April and after 3 cleared.

                  He doped
                  there is an update at the bottom of the article his most recent test just came back negative.

                  Comment

                  • Fetta
                    nob cheese
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 16696
                    • 417
                    • 3
                    • 24,315

                    #49
                    Originally posted by {Darko}
                    there is an update at the bottom of the article his most recent test just came back negative.
                    Yeah would expect that but this whole thing, IMO, is when microdosing goes wrong

                    Comment

                    • Eff Pandas
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Apr 2012
                      • 52130
                      • 3,624
                      • 2,147
                      • 1,635,919

                      #50
                      Originally posted by {Darko}
                      there is an update at the bottom of the article his most recent test just came back negative.
                      I saw that. But does anyone wanna suggest that passing 80% of your PED tests is good enough? For me PED testing is pass/fail. And once you test dirty you failed no matter how many clean tests you have.

                      Unless you are Mexican meat eater anyway it seems.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP