I got no problem with 158. It levels the playing field. Better to see the fight than not see it.
Comments Thread For: Chavez Jr. Advises Canelo To Demand '158' For Golovkin Bout
Collapse
-
"Vamos chico. Vacate!" . . . . "Demand a catch weight amigo!"
Said the fishnet clad late rounds back peddling butt-plug back scuttler and the 6pm breakfast cereal eating bloated blunt smoker.
Nobody's had advisors like these since the Emperor got himself some new clothes.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
I think he was trying to point out that Lemieux had a much higher chance of winning (than Khan vs. Canelo), regardless of what Vegas said, and he had a style that was fight-friendly, and GGG still only got 150K PPVs. Basically, the fans didn't show up. On the flip side, the fans (600K) still bought Canelo vs. Khan. He's calling for the fans to "stop complaining and do something," meaning boycott Canelo until he fights GGG. It's a good article if you read it in it's entirety.Is he saying that people were giving Lemieux a chance to win? Id like to see a comparison of the betting lines on the two fights. I can only imagine that the odds makers viewed both bouts as equally non competitive. Most people I spoke to gave Lemieux little to no chance of winning.
Edit: the numbers do not support Mr Lotierzo's assumption. A quick glance at the betting lines suggest that Alvarez-Khan was viewed as more competitive than Golovkin-Lemieux.
Golovkin: -1400
Lemieux: +1100
Alvarez: -500
Khan: +350
(both figures taken from Bloody Left Elbow)Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment