Why are people blaming Wilder??
Collapse
-
-
Oh please. Stop trying to be diplomatic. Everyone involved in boxing on a professional level knows the drug is a banned substance. He cheated, tested positive, end of story.Obviously there is a slight chance that any sample can be tainted and this is another "ben Johnson" situation. I don't think this is the case. I think Povetkin used and got caught randomly. I think its possible someone in his camp was unaware it was banned since Jan 1, 2016 and gave it to him as the usually do.
If his positive was outside of Russia, there would be a much better argument for tainting.Comment
-
It's not fabricated at all. People are actually using this as an excuse to take shots at Wilder and his team.
There's a conspiracy going on, meldonium was clearly taken off the market to hurt the Russian image.
fat corrupt yanks are probably pulling the strings behind this, as part of the whole Cold War 2.0 crap
Anyway, the Bumzquad is benefitting from this whole debacle
now Windmiller can safely go back to fighting overmatched bums
that glass chin is safe for nowLast edited by ShoulderRoll; 05-16-2016, 02:20 PM.Comment
-
his hinting at the reason isn't inciting racial hatred, its pointing out how race plays a role in how this is being viewed and debated.
true, he did. I said he did. But to answer the question, it is slightly possible that it was tainted, Just not likely.Comment
-
No it doesn't. His prior test came back negative which indicates he took the drug while training. But you can keep living in a fantasy world and inventing silly explanations for this.I think the bold maybe the reason why people are so called hesitant calling him a cheat. The apparent 0.07 mg levels of melodonium plus it only recently being banned coupled together sort of explains peoples leniency towards him. I am a huge huge sasha fan, he let me down but I am holding complete judgement until sample B and everything has concluded. Just as I did with Browne and all the other guys that have tested positive.Comment
-
Comment
-
As did Browne's but alot of people have been lenient towards him. I will not make my mind up on any fighter up until sample B is proven. Then after sample B you look at other variables and come to a logical conclusion. Not oh he tested positive he is a cheat end of. I believe every fighter has a right to prove himself. But some people are jumping the gun.Comment
-
We're not talking about Browne. That's old news and anybody showing "leniency" towards a blatant drug cheat has an agenda.As did Browne's but alot of people have been lenient towards him. I will not make my mind up on any fighter up until sample B is proven. Then after sample B you look at other variables and come to a logical conclusion. Not oh he tested positive he is a cheat end of. I believe every fighter has a right to prove himself. But some people are jumping the gun.
It's hilarious how you keep moving the goal post with "after sample B you look at other variables."
The bottom line is that you are desperately trying to grasp every excuse in the book for this. In short, you're full of shi t.Comment
-
Every excuse in the book? I want POvetkin to get fuc.ked after this.... cause he just ruined one of the big fights this year. But if there is some room to question the legitimacy of the allegations then so be it. his manager thinks he did nothing wrong then it will be easy to prove wont it? So i am going to hold my judgement as i would with any fighter. Until its crystal clear.We're not talking about Browne. That's old news and anybody showing "leniency" towards a blatant drug cheat has an agenda.
It's hilarious how you keep moving the goal post with "after sample B you look at other variables."
The bottom line is that you are desperately trying to grasp every excuse in the book for this. In short, you're full of shi t.Comment
-
Respectfully, a positive test is crystal clear. Sounds like you are going to withhold judgment until Team Povetkin can come up with something that makes this clarity less clear like releasing a statement blaming a team member for accidentally giving him the drug or something else that gives Povetkin plausible deniability.Every excuse in the book? I want POvetkin to get fuc.ked after this.... cause he just ruined one of the big fights this year. But if there is some room to question the legitimacy of the allegations then so be it. his manager thinks he did nothing wrong then it will be easy to prove wont it? So i am going to hold my judgement as i would with any fighter. Until its crystal clear.Comment
Comment