canelo is all hype. just because he KOs a much smaller and chinny fighter means nothing.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Roach: Golovkin-Canelo No Longer a Walkover, Very Competitive
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by ThomasJK View PostFreddie's just as full of ***** as anyone else.
Honestly, after GGG lays the beat down on Alvarez, I would like to see Alvarez face some of the opponents that GGG has fought. That is if he doesn't suckle back down to the SWW/LMW division where he can cut weight and bully around smaller fighters come fight night. Opponents like Murray, Lemieux, and maybe even Stevens. A litmus test so to speak. Just to see how Alvarez compares to some of the so called 'tomato cans' GGG has annihilated.
Just a couple of thoughts.....
When you wrote the bold, did it occur to you that.....
1) Canelo has never fought a middleweight opponent..... not one, EVER
2) Most people would expect " A litmus test so to speak " before the kid faces a beast like Golovkin
Originally posted by ThomasJK View PostCanelo has always been 'marketed' as some man-child phenom, and this scheme has set him up against true HOF's like Cotto, Mosely, and Mayweather. Won two by decision over (let's face it) "passed their primers",....and got "SCHOOLED" for his first loss and left the ring with a jab spanked red face. Not exactly a spectacular shining record when you sit back and look at the big picture.
Canelo fought " true HOF'ers ", who were past-their-prime.....
Golovkin has fought nobody even close.
It is what it is.
Originally posted by ThomasJK View PostI'm not a Canelo hater by any stretch, and I'm still a fan of his, but GGG is the 'goods' and I know the goods when I see it. This catch weight BS is a real disappointment from the Canelo side, and in the end it will do more harm to him than good.
Canelo has shown much more, against much better fighters.
I favor Golovkin, but that fight will be closer than most people think.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Divine Hammer View Postcanelo is all hype. just because he KOs a much smaller and chinny fighter means nothing.
Look what happens when I change the bold.....
Originally posted by Divine Hammer View Postgolovkin is all hype. just because he KOs a much worse fighter means nothing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Reloaded View PostThe eyes see fighters perform , the eyes read hype , learn boxing to understand what you see and you will figure out the difference .
Comment
-
Originally posted by Divine Hammer View Postall i see is mediocrity u chump. canelo only looks impressive beating on smaller guys like chavez jr and punk donaire does. they're all cowards. and they all failed big time when they face guys their own size or bigger.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View PostLook what happens when I change the bold.....
Originally posted by Divine Hammer View Postgolovkin is all hype. just because he KOs a much worse fighter means nothing.
LMAO
Originally posted by Divine Hammer View Postall i see is mediocrity u chump. canelo only looks impressive beating on smaller guys
Look what happens when I change the bold.....
Originally posted by Divine Hammer View Postall i see is mediocrity u chump. Golovkin only looks impressive beating on bums
Comment
-
The bigger guy doesn't always win, just look how the Cotto vs Pacquiao turn out, Cotto getting smacked up and stopped! Most people thought Cotto was going to beat Pacquiao because he was the bigger stronger guy and knew how to box well, but little Pacman beat the living crap out of Cotto sending him home packing!Last edited by Toltec77; 05-11-2016, 08:30 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Toltec77 View PostThe bigger guy doesn't always win, just look how the Cotto vs Pacquiao turn out, Cotto getting smacked up and stopped! Most people thought Cotto was going to beat Pacquiao because he was the bigger stronger guy and knew how to box well, but little Pacman beat the living crap out of Cotto sending him home packing!
Even if he was lighter than GGG, you just can't compare the two. Dude fights nothing like Pac.
Comment
Comment