Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Its a mistake to call out GGG

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Redd Foxx View Post
    Again, fight numbers are about synergy. Lara does nothing on his own. But, put him in with someone people want to see challenged and he fits that role perfectly. It's not just about likes and dislikes, it's about the intrigue of the match himself. I have no doubt this would be a viable PPV for Genady, better than Lemieux because you get the people who root for Genady AND the ones who root against him. That's how WWE stayed viable in PPV for so long and how Mayweather make PPV history. The foil is as important as the hero.

    As I told Pulp, I see both sides and the legitimacy of each argument. I don't actually think it's a good idea to fight Lara and if I were his manager I'd tell Genady to forget about Lara because the risk isn't worth the reward. What GGG's doing now works for him so it's not like he needs to start ******** on wild cards.
    Ok so where does Lara exactly fit in? There is Canelo, Saunders and Jacobs at middleweight, all better options and more intriguing, as well as financially if you want to go that route. Lara is pretty low on the totem pole, last we saw him (all fourteen of us) was against Jan Zaveck and he's going to fight Vanes next in the rematch the entire boxing world hasn't been waiting for. So I mean, yeah it would be a good fight if Canelo, Saunders, Jacobs, Ramirez, Chavez jr, and DeGale all pass on Golovkin and Lara can beat Vanes. Then yes, it would make sense. The only reason I would want this fight is just so the NSB crowd can see it happen, but I wouldn't feel good for Lara at all, it's a nightmare matchup for him and he has better, more achievable goals at 154 imo. He's a solid boxer at 154, stylistically Golovkin is the worst possible opponent for him.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Sun_Tzu View Post
      Lol, Golovkin is ducking Lara, lol.

      Lara gets his shit pushed in inside of three rounds, whats the point exactly?
      The only guy GGG ducked was Ward , he just side steps the others issuing lame excuses and the slurpers swallow it all , same fans did the same with Manny , you never hear saying Manny can fight GGG and Gennady called Manny out , that one just dont get mentioned .lol .

      See the same ol pattern , anything their hero does is what they will argue for .

      Read slowly all thee GGG slurpers .

      Its not Ward , its not Lara , its not Brook , its not Ramirez .

      ITS ALL OF THEM .

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by ИATAS View Post
        Ok so where does Lara exactly fit in? There is Canelo, Saunders and Jacobs at middleweight, all better options and more intriguing, as well as financially if you want to go that route. Lara is pretty low on the totem pole, last we saw him (all fourteen of us) was against Jan Zaveck and he's going to fight Vanes next in the rematch the entire boxing world hasn't been waiting for. So I mean, yeah it would be a good fight if Canelo, Saunders, Jacobs, Ramirez, Chavez jr, and DeGale all pass on Golovkin and Lara can beat Vanes. Then yes, it would make sense. The only reason I would want this fight is just so the NSB crowd can see it happen, but I wouldn't feel good for Lara at all, it's a nightmare matchup for him and he has better, more achievable goals at 154 imo. He's a solid boxer at 154, stylistically Golovkin is the worst possible opponent for him.
        but but but but Lara doe

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
          It'll be his best win by a mile.

          That depends on your point of view I reckon. All the moving he did against Canelo will be null and void by the second round because unlike Canelo, Golovkin will cut him off and then summarily chop him down. He isnt big enough and he doesnt have the pop to keep Golovkin at bay. Im all for Golovkin getting in the ring with some elite talent but Lara gets massacred, you know it, I know it and the Golovkin hate train knows it.

          Bring on the real threats, lets let Lara keep his head.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Sun_Tzu View Post
            That depends on your point of view I reckon. All the moving he did against Canelo will be null and void by the second round because unlike Canelo, Golovkin will cut him off and then summarily chop him down. He isnt big enough and he doesnt have the pop to keep Golovkin at bay. Im all for Golovkin getting in the ring with some elite talent but Lara gets massacred, you know it, I know it and the Golovkin hate train knows it.

            Bring on the real threats, lets let Lara keep his head.
            Hate? What does this have to do with hate?

            He's been heavily favoured to massacre everyone he's been in with so far, so why not Lara? It's a damn sight better than having a Wade or a Monroe on your resume.

            The thought terrifies his fanbase for some reason though.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
              Hate? What does this have to do with hate?

              He's been heavily favoured to massacre everyone he's been in with so far, so why not Lara? It's a damn sight better than having a Wade or a Monroe on your resume.

              The thought terrifies his fanbase for some reason though.
              Do you not read this forum? There are literally 10 threads minimum a day hating on him, that hate..thats what Im talking about.

              Like I said, there is little to no reason to fight Lara. There are bigger fish to fry then to be ***ing around with some fore gone conclusion.

              Comment


              • #67
                Yes, he should fight every person that calls him out. He could probably fit about 6 fights per year doing that.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Sun_Tzu View Post
                  Do you not read this forum? There are literally 10 threads minimum a day hating on him, that hate..thats what Im talking about.

                  Like I said, there is little to no reason to fight Lara. There are bigger fish to fry then to be ***ing around with some fore gone conclusion.
                  You quoted me and mentioned hate, the implication being my post was hate filled.

                  Bigger fish? Like Wade you mean? Yeah, that wasn't a foregone conclusion in any way, shape or form.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
                    You quoted me and mentioned hate, the implication being my post was hate filled.

                    Bigger fish? Like Wade you mean? Yeah, that wasn't a foregone conclusion in any way, shape or form.
                    No, that wasnt the implication. I said " You know it, I know it and the Golovkin hate train knows it." See the separation there between you and any hate. Yea, the wade fight was a forgone conclusion just like a Lara fight to a lesser extent would be. It was a mandatory, what do you want the guy to do? My point was and is lets get him in the ring with some real threats, not some chicken leg jmw who is going to get blasted inside of 5 rounds.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by TheCell8 View Post
                      Yes, he should fight every person that calls him out. He could probably fit about 6 fights per year doing that.
                      Just one would be good so far its none .

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP