Lara I can see the reasoning behind at least - the guy has proved himself as top dog at JMW, but brings minimal reward. Still it's a fight I wouldn't mind seeing. But Brook? Really? What a conniving snake GGG is! - 'side stepping' Welters! You're right, the man has no shame. I'm taking him off my Christmas card list! And Ramirez. Goddamn it, how can a duck get any blatant? - GGGs even pretending he wants to fight him to throw people off the scent! What a scoundrel!
Which leaves Ward. Massive risk. Big reward. But can you really blame GGG for choosing to pursue the big $s Cotto / Canelo unifier over the tricky and uncertain path to SMW glory when it seemed in the palm of his hand? Seems like common sense to me. Bigger money, easier fight. No brainer. You'd be defending Golovkin using that exact same argument if you happened to like him.
It's all about risk and reward, baby, risk and reward.
Still can't stop
@ GGG ducking Kell. You weren't actually serious were you?
Which leaves Ward. Massive risk. Big reward. But can you really blame GGG for choosing to pursue the big $s Cotto / Canelo unifier over the tricky and uncertain path to SMW glory when it seemed in the palm of his hand? Seems like common sense to me. Bigger money, easier fight. No brainer. You'd be defending Golovkin using that exact same argument if you happened to like him.
It's all about risk and reward, baby, risk and reward.
Still can't stop
@ GGG ducking Kell. You weren't actually serious were you?
Comment