Originally posted by Mr.Fantastic
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
You've got to give Andre Ward credit
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Cutthroat View Post
Barrera is a legit boxer, you don't go 285-27 beating the likes of Chad Dawson without boxing ability. Factor in his 6'2 frame, 67% ko rate, it makes him more dangerous than anyone Kov or Stevenson have faced.
The most dangerous LHW each man has faced was Stevenson-Fonfara (50% ko rate) and Kov.-Cleverly 47%
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ИATAS View PostBS man. Smith was coming off back to back losses, had to fight at a catchweight of 172 pounds and came in himself at 176½, flabby and not giving a ****. I'd pick Monroe over flabby Paul Smith any day.
Comment
-
Originally posted by larryxxx... View PostBack to back title fight loses..and Monroe had done what?? Lost to Darnell Boone and had no championship experience...so yea he lost to Abraham 2 times and Degale..so id say he fought the better comp
Comment
-
Originally posted by larryxxx... View PostBack to back title fight loses..and Monroe had done what?? Lost to Darnell Boone and had no championship experience...so yea he lost to Abraham 2 times and Degale..so id say he fought the better comp
Comment
-
Originally posted by ИATAS View PostYeah and Joe Calzaghe had a 75% KO ratio. Don't try to BS people who've seen Sullivan fight. If you want to say its impressive beating Sullivan because he's a skilled fighter, fine, but don't try to pull "he's a big threat because he has a 67% KO ratio!" as if that means anything. Quite frankly, a guy who is a big puncher should have a higher KO ratio considering the level of opponents he's faced so far. Sure, he was able to KO shot to bits Jeff Lacy but went the distance against 9-13 Larry Pryor and 16-10 Joell Godfrey, etc. KO Ratio isn't telling us anything much at all, especially when we're discussing prospects who haven't faced good opponents yet.
You act like lil g or Kovalev haven't gone 12 with no names lol.
Comment
Comment