Who can keep up with PBC schedule? The on too many channels. I'm a huge boxing fan and I have no clue what the hell their doing over there. They have the WORST business plan I've ever seen. Heck when Algieri and Spence fought I had to look up what station they were fighting on. They act like theyre run by circus clowns.
Comments Thread For: Golovkin-Wade Registers As Most-Watched Cable TV Fight of 2016
Collapse
-
-
That sheet and the numbers boxing scene posts always match up. Kim might have lied and they followed him.Yeah I just saw another source and the numbers don't add up. If it really did 1.08 then that's a pretty big dip from the 1.3mil he did his last HBO live fight (Monroe). Not terrible for HBO but not great for the GGG hype machine. Not sure why boxingscene are lying about the numbers thou SMHComment
-
I'm not accusing them of intentionally misrepresenting the numbers btw. It's far more likely that I'm missing some knowledge that would make the numbers make sense to me.
I would have chalked it off to a small error but there doesn't seem to be any row where P 18-49 = M 18-49 + F 18-49 as I would have thought.Last edited by BrometheusBob.; 04-26-2016, 11:55 AM.Comment
-
This week is on Fox and Spike TV. Is it that hard?Who can keep up with PBC schedule? The on too many channels. I'm a huge boxing fan and I have no clue what the hell their doing over there. They have the WORST business plan I've ever seen. Heck when Algieri and Spence fought I had to look up what station they were fighting on. They act like theyre run by circus clowns.Comment
-
Oh no. Steve Kim made up these numbers.I'm not accusing them of intentionally misrepresenting the numbers btw. It's far more likely that I'm missing some knowledge that would make the numbers make sense to me.
I would have chalked it off to a small error but there doesn't seem to be any row where P 18-49 = M 18-49 + F 18-49 as I would have thought.Comment
-
They are shares of the TV audience. The number at the end is total viewers.I'm not accusing them of intentionally misrepresenting the numbers btw. It's far more likely that I'm missing some knowledge that would make the numbers make sense to me.
I would have chalked it off to a small error but there doesn't seem to be any row where P 18-49 = M 18-49 + F 18-49 as I would have thought.
DEMOGRAPHIC DETAIL: For each broadcast program (or hour segment), the chart below displays preliminary key advertiser demographics (adult 18-34, 18-49 and 25-54 ratings), audience skews (women 18-49, men 18-49 and adults 50+ shares) and total viewership (thousands of people over the age of 2)Comment
-
Ahh I see, thanks for the clarification.They are shares of the TV audience. The number at the end is total viewers.
DEMOGRAPHIC DETAIL: For each broadcast program (or hour segment), the chart below displays preliminary key advertiser demographics (adult 18-34, 18-49 and 25-54 ratings), audience skews (women 18-49, men 18-49 and adults 50+ shares) and total viewership (thousands of people over the age of 2)
Hopefully the author of this article will offer an update about the numbers. If this article is indeed in error, it would be a pretty sizable error for 1.089 to be stated as 1.325 and to be sold as the biggest boxing broadcast on hbo this year. 1.089 is plausible and right in line with Ward-Barrera and Kov-Pascal II iirc.Comment
-
Even 1.3 isn't great. Wlad got 1.7. Golovkin really speaks to LA Mexicans but in Texas he's nothing. In New York his appeal is over blown. Danny Garcia has done 12k before.Comment
-
ShowBuzzDaily on top of keeping track of ratings of shows such as The Muppets, Dance Moms, and House Hunters also happen to be massive Andre Ward and Canelo Alvarez fans, and fudged the numbers in a grand conspiratorial scheme against Gennady Golovkin.
Yeah.
Let's run with that.
Comment
Comment