Originally posted by Razcal26
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Kellerman responds to criticism about calling Pac best of era
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by considerthis View PostYou may not agree with him, but you can't honestly say that. That's why kellerman was cool on espn...cuz it was like a hardcore fan was given a job as an analyst.
Sure, he'll throw around names of past greats and occasionally he'll throw out and unsung hero of a certain era but he never uses them in the correct context or makes any type of sense.
I remember when he said Zab Judah was like Pernell Whitaker. Or take James Toney and Floyd are very similar.
He may know the names, but he doesn't know the context
Comment
-
I highly doubt Kellerman believes that Pacquiao is better than Mayweather. Max is a student of boxing. However, every once in a while he'll say some off the cuff things especially when it comes to Pacquiao. It sounds like he's just sticking to the HBO script.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Razcal26 View PostLet me tell you something; me personally, never liked Max.
Sure, he'll throw around names of past greats and occasionally he'll throw out and unsung hero of a certain era but he never uses them in the correct context or makes any type of sense.
I remember when he said Zab Judah was like Pernell Whitaker. Or take James Toney and Floyd are very similar.
He may know the names, but he doesn't know the context
Comment
-
Originally posted by RetroSpeed05 View PostMax might say some ridiculous stuff sometimes, but he is a hardcore fan. Just like people on BS we are all hard cores no matter what crazy things some posters write. If you were a casual you would not know, watch or visit this site or know of any fight except the big fights.
Whenever I hear him talk, I just think he's FOS.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BrometheusBob. View PostSays something along the lines of - beating a fighter isn't proof you are better in a P4P sense. If GGG beat Mayweather in a fight that was in any way competitive, he'd still consider Mayweather the better P4P fighter because it took more for Floyd to move up that many times and be competitive in a fight than it did for GGG to take on a smaller man and win. Similarly he believes that since Pacquiao, as the former lineal flyweight champion, had to move up more times to make it to WW that what he did in winning some rounds against Floyd was more impressive in his opinion than Floyd winning against the naturally smaller fighter. Says Pacquiao being a top fighter at WW, as a former flyweight, would be like Floyd, a former SFW, being a top fighter at SMW.
I don't agree personally, but figured why not make the thread anyway since the video has like no views and the original statement from Kellerman had prompted a lot of discussion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CmWUbGR1WQ
Pacquiao has done everything better or more often than Mayweather. That's not even an opinion. If we are basing the entirety of their generation/era on one fight...then I don't know what to tell you. In that case, Frazier is better than Ali, Saddler better than Pep and Marciano better than Moore.
Comment
-
Originally posted by soul_survivor View PostHe is absolutely on point. Pacquiao was better to watch, fought better opponents, beat them more convincingly and won more titles and/or fight at the highest level in more weight divisions than Mayweather.
Pacquiao has done everything better or more often than Mayweather. That's not even an opinion. If we are basing the entirety of their generation/era on one fight...then I don't know what to tell you. In that case, Frazier is better than Ali, Saddler better than Pep and Marciano better than Moore.
Comment
-
Originally posted by soul_survivor View PostHe is absolutely on point. Pacquiao was better to watch, fought better opponents, beat them more convincingly and won more titles and/or fight at the highest level in more weight divisions than Mayweather.
Pacquiao has done everything better or more often than Mayweather. That's not even an opinion. If we are basing the entirety of their generation/era on one fight...then I don't know what to tell you. In that case, Frazier is better than Ali, Saddler better than Pep and Marciano better than Moore.Last edited by Kagami Taiga; 04-21-2016, 02:21 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kagami Taiga View Posthe didnt BEAT the better opponents. time to kill that noise.
Mayweathers best win is a SD over Oscar, or close wins over Castillo or a tough but impressive night against Hatton. Who else is there, Corrales? Ortiz? Guerrero? Berto? Genaro?
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostHe also lost more often and "better" (I guess worst) than Floyd did. Does that count for anything?
Being second to Pacquiao or 3rd to Hopkins is in noway a smear. Mayweather was a great fighter, one of the best but Pacquiao did more and looked better doing it.
Comment
Comment