Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Roach Rips Errol Spence: He Can't Carry Pacquiao's Bags!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by megas30 View Post
    Foolishness. What does one need to be ready for Pacquiao? Pac has never beaten a technical fighter in their prime. He fought war torn Barrera and Morales. Everyone else was either converted southpaws without a right hand or just plain limited. Mayweather struggles with Brawlers and Pac struggles with technical fighters. Brawlers don't allow Mayweather space to be cute, and technical fighters confuse Pac.

    What Spence has shown that he will give Pac and May fits. Not sure if he wins, but it won't be an easy fight for either man. This is man is ready for anyone at welter---retired or active.
    War torn Morales, Barrera > Spence.

    Spence has shown that? All I remember him doing is beating Algieri, which doesn't show he could trouble Mayweather or Pacquiao.

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by KnickTillDeaTh View Post
      Funny stuff coming from Roach. If Algeiri is not a real fight for Spence, then what was Algeiri when Pac fought him?
      Algeiri was coming off the biggest win, was now a champ, and Pac used him as a tune up/come back fight. This tune up for Pac was Spence's biggest fight of his career.

      Comment


      • #73
        What the **** am I reading?

        Did ANYONE see Spence's fight before Algieri? The guy was getting tagged by straight rights ALL day by someone who should not have given him ANY problems. I like Spence but Pac would beat him. I don't even think Spence would beat Bradley. He needs a TOP win now, the like of Porter, Thurman, Brook, Garcia.

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by hayZ View Post
          What the **** am I reading?

          Did ANYONE see Spence's fight before Algieri? The guy was getting tagged by straight rights ALL day by someone who should not have given him ANY problems. I like Spence but Pac would beat him. I don't even think Spence would beat Bradley. He needs a TOP win now, the like of Porter, Thurman, Brook, Garcia.
          He didnt say whether Manny beats him , he answered why he stopped Algieri and Manny didnt , everybody seems to be going off on a tangent adding things he didnt say .

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by Reloaded View Post
            He didnt say whether Manny beats him , he answered why he stopped Algieri and Manny didnt , everybody seems to be going off on a tangent adding things he didnt say .
            I meant what the **** am I reading in this thread.

            I'm reading people right Pac has no footwork...LMAO WHAT. I'm reading he isn't technical, like hes some face first brawler. He is smart, uses his footwork, angles. You don't do what Pac has done and not be somewhat technical. Sure he's not technical like a Mayweather, Marquez but that doesn't mean he doesn't have that in his game.

            Spences camp also saying he's ready for all of them at 147. I think yeah, he's ready to compete against ALL of them, beating them all is an entirely different question. I enjoy his style, been following him for a few years now.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by LOCOMEX89 View Post
              Errol Spence should fight Kell Brook, or Danny Garcia next.

              Then if he's able to fight Pac for a big payday and big exposure.
              Trust me, there is no way roach would let pac get in the ring with spence. He is too good a boxer and he is powerful and fast. He is a dedicated body puncher. And spence comments were not off. It's a known fact pac has trouble cutting off the ring. His fundamentals are flawed and that roaches horrible fault. He never taught pac defense or positioning. His comments were not disrespectful they were his opinion. And if roach feels so strongly he should make the fight with spence and have pac beat is ass. Otherwise STFU **** roach.

              Comment


              • #77
                I have to agree with Roach. Just because he stopped a fighter that Pac didn't doesn't mean he's capable of beating him. Hell Pac beat DLH, Cotto, Hatton, and Mosley in better fashion then Floyd and we all know the results of that matchup.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by hayZ View Post
                  I meant what the **** am I reading in this thread.

                  I'm reading people right Pac has no footwork...LMAO WHAT. I'm reading he isn't technical, like hes some face first brawler. He is smart, uses his footwork, angles. You don't do what Pac has done and not be somewhat technical. Sure he's not technical like a Mayweather, Marquez but that doesn't mean he doesn't have that in his game.

                  Spences camp also saying he's ready for all of them at 147. I think yeah, he's ready to compete against ALL of them, beating them all is an entirely different question. I enjoy his style, been following him for a few years now.
                  I don't think pacs accomplishments are being discounted. He has some notable flaws but has succeeded in spite of them. Same as roy jones. His flaws were always brought up when discussing his success. I don't see how spence comments were disrespectful.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Spence a fkg clown

                    this clown hasn't even won 1 championship and is talking out his azz already.

                    Algieri was leftovers. Bradley KOd Rios, and Rios went the distance with Pacman.

                    the Gayweather ball lickers are just looking for their next sack to cling onto.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      You can't compare. Algeiri fought Spence differently than when he fought Manny. After JD Jackson got Algeiri, he became a less defensive, come forward fighter (a la the Khan fight). Manny was great. Spence will be great.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP