Comments Thread For: Roach Rips Errol Spence: He Can't Carry Pacquiao's Bags!

[boxingfan4life]

Spence drops and KO's Pac if they fight. The kid is too much for an old and war torn Pacman.

KO's Pac. That's a bit extreme. Who has Spence beaten to even warrant a fight with Pac right now? Don't get me Spence is good kid and all but I think folks are blowing it out of proportion from the Algeri win. People acting like Algeri was a Kell Brook caliber fighter.

[KnickTillDeaTh]

Algeiri was coming off the biggest win, was now a champ, and Pac used him as a tune up/come back fight. This tune up for Pac was Spence's biggest fight of his career.

In what way does your comment answer my question? Algeiri who has defeated Probodnikov, whent 12 with Pac, and gave Khan a tuff fight, if that Algeiri is not a real fight for an up and commer like Spence, then WTF was Pac doing fighting him? I know the answer to that question, it was rhetorical. As well as revealing, because anybody who doesn't think Algeiri was a good win for Spence, but defends and proclaims Algeiri as a good victory for Pac, I'd be impressed they were able to type while being spit roasted by Pac and Buboy. I sincerely hope you don't fall into that category.

[megas30]

War torn Morales, Barrera > Spence.

Spence has shown that? All I remember him doing is beating Algieri, which doesn't show he could trouble Mayweather or Pacquiao.

No, they couldn't and you know it. The version of Morales and Barrera whom Manny had beaten cannot beat Spence. Dude, they couldn't even beat Khan, Maidana, and Raheem. Imagine if we say this for all prospects? None would have ever gotten a chance to fight a so-called elite. You dudes need to quit and let the young lions call out the old ones to prove themselves. I will bet my house that Spence beat Manny if they were to fight.

[BrometheusBob.]

No, they couldn't and you know it. The version of Morales and Barrera whom Manny had beaten cannot beat Spence. Dude, they couldn't even beat Khan, Maidana, and Raheem.

The version of Morales and Barrera (of fight 1) that Pacquiao beat are way better P4P than Spence has shown to be as of now is what I meant. Spence may turn out to be better, who knows, but hasn't shown me anything to put him on that level yet.

Imagine if we say this for all prospects? None would have ever gotten a chance to fight a so-called elite. You dudes need to quit and let the young lions call out the old ones to prove themselves. I will bet my house that Spence beat Manny if they were to fight.

Who says I'm suggesting that all elite fighters should turn down all prospects? Heck, who says I'm even suggesting that Manny shouldn't fight Spence? I don't think Spence beats Manny but that's not even my point. He put in a great performance against an OK fighter to enter the top 10 on the major lists, but that doesn't necessarily put you in the front of the line to get the best of the best. Brook, Garcia, Thurman, Porter have all done more than Spence. I'm not asking for Manny to not fight Spence, I'd watch that of course, just calling it like I see it.

[BlackSoul]

pacquiao would NEVER get in the ring with an Errol Spence bc he NEVER has got in there with a fighter like that in his career. bc his handlers KNOW BETTER

[megas30]

[QUOTE=BrometheusBob.;16631427]

The version of Morales and Barrera (of fight 1) that Pacquiao beat are way better P4P than Spence has shown to be as of now is what I meant. Spence may turn out to be better, who knows, but hasn't shown me anything to put him on that level yet.

This is subjective and it is cool. You know it is real difficult to talk p4p, when Manny is actually fighting in the same weight class as Spence. Those versions of Barrera and Morales, transported to the ring, today, against Spence would lose, and those are the versions Manny has beaten and which you used as reference

Who says I'm suggesting that all elite fighters should turn down all prospects? Heck, who says I'm even suggesting that Manny shouldn't fight Spence? I don't think Spence beats Manny but that's not even my point. He put in a great performance against an OK fighter to enter the top 10 on the major lists, but that doesn't necessarily put you in the front of the line to get the best of the best. Brook, Garcia, Thurman, Porter have all done more than Spence. I'm not asking for Manny to not fight Spence, I'd watch that of course, just calling it like I see it.

Explain to me how do you see this fight playing out? In other words, how do you see Manny beating Spence?

[North Star]

In what way does your comment answer my question? Algeiri who has defeated Probodnikov, whent 12 with Pac, and gave Khan a tuff fight, if that Algeiri is not a real fight for an up and commer like Spence, then WTF was Pac doing fighting him? I know the answer to that question, it was rhetorical. As well as revealing, because anybody who doesn't think Algeiri was a good win for Spence, but defends and proclaims Algeiri as a good victory for Pac, I'd be impressed they were able to type while being spit roasted by Pac and Buboy. I sincerely hope you don't fall into that category.

It was an answer to your question. Why post a question and not expect it to be answered? For Pac it was a tune up. For Spence it's his biggest career win. The point being beating Algeiri was nothing to write home about.

[BrometheusBob.]

pacquiao would NEVER get in the ring with an Errol Spence bc he NEVER has got in there with a fighter like that in his career. bc his handlers KNOW BETTER

That sig tho

[BlackSoul]

That sig tho

i'm gettin' into that mane so you cant touch that one. thats my personal. but some of the others i put on here from time to time you can