Terence Crawford vs Errol Spence Jr - who wins?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GhostofDempsey
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2017
    • 31852
    • 13,213
    • 8,734
    • 493,602

    #41
    I would favor Spence. He has proven he can take a punch from a big strong WW in Brook. He won't be rocked by Crawford who has to move up in weight. Crawford has yet to be tested by a big puncher with boxing skills. If he gets tagged a few times by Spence he may just crawl into a shell and stay on the defensive.

    Comment

    • Mammoth
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2016
      • 35717
      • 3,849
      • 3,389
      • 378,304

      #42
      Originally posted by Sheldon312
      No, he is too small and he gets hit too much
      No... His skillset is better

      Comment

      • NYG
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2017
        • 3019
        • 303
        • 117
        • 22,077

        #43
        Spence might be a little too big and strong for Crawford, i favor Spence just because he has a size advantage and he has skills too

        Comment

        • Sheldon312
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2016
          • 2650
          • 165
          • 65
          • 33,229

          #44
          Originally posted by Mammoth
          No... His skillset is better
          Let me explain this to you. Spence is basically a Middleweight who makes Welterweight. Crawford is basically a lightweight who rehydrates to welterweight. Crawford has more of an arsenal but Spence has power, footwork, chin, and he can cut off the ring. The reason Kell was able to have some success was due to the fact that he was a big welterweight. Crawford won't have that same success due to huge size disparity. Think of Oscar vs Pernell or Hearns vs Wilfred. If Crawford had Floyd level defense then this would be 50/50. Crawford doesn't have it so he is a under dog against the top welterweights.

          Comment

          • Fists_of_Fury
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Feb 2006
            • 7366
            • 2,351
            • 12,608
            • 58,085

            #45
            Spence by T/KO. Crawford got buzzed by inactive and blown up Gamboa ffs... that was with a massive size advantage too. Crawford hasn't fought anyone remotely good since then too... Postol doe Diaz doe. Spence bodies the Top Rank hype job. Let Crawford have his time as undisputed weak 140lb champ because if he moves to welterweight and fights the top guys he will lose to a few of them.

            Comment

            • CatchAndShoot
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2014
              • 3534
              • 257
              • 202
              • 17,533

              #46
              I'd be lying if I said I know for sure who wins. My head says Spence, but my head also says TC. 50/50.

              Comment

              • BoomBoomBaam
                Up and Comer
                • Apr 2016
                • 98
                • 10
                • 14
                • 6,396

                #47
                I got Spence winning mainly due to size. If they were both the same size it would be 50/50 for me.

                Comment

                • Mammoth
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2016
                  • 35717
                  • 3,849
                  • 3,389
                  • 378,304

                  #48
                  I wonder how these guys look standing next to one another

                  Comment

                  • TheCell8
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2016
                    • 5551
                    • 353
                    • 44
                    • 38,715

                    #49
                    As good as Crawford is, I don't think he'll be as successful at WW. There is a huge skill gap between 140 and 147. On top of that, the other WWs are all going to be bigger and stronger than him. Errol Spence for example, would just run through his punches and probably stop him.

                    Not to say he wouldn't have any success. I think he would beat Pacquiao, Danny Garcia, Jeff Horn, Amir Khan. But Thurman, Porter and Spence would be very tough fights.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP