Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Golovkin unimpressed by Pac's performance, calls him "uninteresting"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Ofcourse it wasn't interesting its happened three times and all three times should have been the same outcome if that makes sense this is why he has said that.
    Canelo should If he can beat Khan see what he can do to get a fight with Pacquiao my god how big would that be I hate Canelo for being a diva ***** but I'm a sucker for mega-fights.

    Comment


    • #32
      I thought this was the same guy that said '154-168 doe'

      Why are you listening to him now?

      Comment


      • #33
        Golovkin was clearly talking about the fight. He never called Pacquiao uninteresting as a fight, holy crap you anti-GGG boys are straight up hating any point you possibly can find.

        "I don't like GGG because he's a hypocrite!", yeah, right. That's the real reason .

        It was uninteresting. Pacquiao won clearly the first two fights. I liked all three fights, and I like Bradley and Pacquiao both, but there was nothing exciting/on-the-line in anticipation with these fights. Nothing at all.




        Anyways, here's the basic transcript of what was said since the interviewer and GGG were so ****ing quiet


        Interviewer: "You see the Pacquiao-Bradley fight?"

        GGG: "I saw it."

        Interviewer: "What did you think about that?"

        GGG: Nods head in a, "no" fashion.

        GGG: "Excuse me. It's nothing, nothing. Not interesting."

        Interviewer: inaudible question?

        GGG: "Canelo-Pacquiao? more interesting".

        ...pause...

        GGG: "With what weight?"

        Interviewer: "Uhhh, they're saying 155."

        GGG: "Think a little too big. Too big. Strong"
        GGG: "I think Manny he have a couple more fight. With Crawford, Thurman, Garcia."

        Interviewer: ??? something about weight ??? or did he say, "should he stay away?"

        GGG: "I don't know. Is boxing. Is business."

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by SniXSniPe View Post
          Golovkin was clearly talking about the fight. He never called Pacquiao uninteresting as a fight, holy crap you anti-GGG boys are straight up hating any point you possibly can find.

          "I don't like GGG because he's a hypocrite!", yeah, right. That's the real reason .

          It was uninteresting. Pacquiao won clearly the first two fights. I liked all three fights, and I like Bradley and Pacquiao both, but there was nothing exciting/on-the-line in anticipation with these fights. Nothing at all.




          Anyways, here's the basic transcript of what was said since the interviewer and GGG were so ****ing quiet


          Interviewer: "You see the Pacquiao-Bradley fight?"

          GGG: "I saw it."

          Interviewer: "What did you think about that?"

          GGG: Nods head in a, "no" fashion.

          GGG: "Excuse me. It's nothing, nothing. Not interesting."

          Interviewer: inaudible question?

          GGG: "Canelo-Pacquiao? more interesting".

          ...pause...

          GGG: "With what weight?"

          Interviewer: "Uhhh, they're saying 155."

          GGG: "Think a little too big. Too big. Strong"
          GGG: "I think Manny he have a couple more fight. With Crawford, Thurman, Garcia."

          Interviewer: ??? something about weight ??? or did he say, "should he stay away?"

          GGG: "I don't know. Is boxing. Is business."
          This. Green on the way.

          Comment


          • #35
            Well he is right, nobody was really interested in a 3rd fight between Pac and Bradley. That is what he meant

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by SniXSniPe View Post
              Golovkin was clearly talking about the fight. He never called Pacquiao uninteresting as a fight, holy crap you anti-GGG boys are straight up hating any point you possibly can find.

              "I don't like GGG because he's a hypocrite!", yeah, right. That's the real reason .

              It was uninteresting. Pacquiao won clearly the first two fights. I liked all three fights, and I like Bradley and Pacquiao both, but there was nothing exciting/on-the-line in anticipation with these fights. Nothing at all.




              Anyways, here's the basic transcript of what was said since the interviewer and GGG were so ****ing quiet


              Interviewer: "You see the Pacquiao-Bradley fight?"

              GGG: "I saw it."

              Interviewer: "What did you think about that?"

              GGG: Nods head in a, "no" fashion.

              GGG: "Excuse me. It's nothing, nothing. Not interesting."

              Interviewer: inaudible question?

              GGG: "Canelo-Pacquiao? more interesting".

              ...pause...

              GGG: "With what weight?"

              Interviewer: "Uhhh, they're saying 155."

              GGG: "Think a little too big. Too big. Strong"
              GGG: "I think Manny he have a couple more fight. With Crawford, Thurman, Garcia."

              Interviewer: ??? something about weight ??? or did he say, "should he stay away?"

              GGG: "I don't know. Is boxing. Is business."

              Amazing isn't it? These guys will find any random Golovkin video/interview, post some clickbait title and then commence to circle jerk together about how much they hate Golovkin! Every day all day, this is their life now.

              Comment


              • #37
                Golovkin was asked what he thought of the fight between Pac and Bradley and he responded "it was uninteresting." He never said anything about Pac being an uninteresting fighter. Stop trolling. Frankly, i thought the fight was uninteresting as well. No one really cared about this fight to begin with.

                Comment


                • #38
                  He's entitled to his opinion.
































                  Even if it's wrong.
                  EDIT: Seems like he was talking about Pac/Bradley III as opposed to Pacquiao himself. Dam you clickbaiting OP.
                  Last edited by BrometheusBob.; 04-14-2016, 06:44 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    I don't think he understood the question...

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Lol. I was thinking this had to be either a FightHype or a Dontae video. He clearly says the fight wasn't interesting.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP