Golovkin unimpressed by Pac's performance, calls him "uninteresting"

[Nubia]

So you are laughing at yourself? They ve already explained to you that he meant that the fight with bradley wasnt interesting

[Razcal26]

you really can't keep up with the dialogue of this 2 minute video? At least refer to a point you think I misunderstood.

There really is no need.

The guy's English isn't crisp at all, so no matter what the title of the video was, anybody watching it would have had their own interpretation of what he meant.

It was just funny to see you try and clean it up.

[Zaroku]

I don't think that'll be the case. They're gonna put all their chips in a retired fighter? Nah, they'll stay on GGG's jock.

I just found it interesting that he wasn't impressed by Pac's performance against a top 10 P4P fighter. GGG looks as good as Pac did against Bradley but against total unknown bums.

Yeah, your right... All GGG has to say is he is fighting PAC - Mexican style..

[Redd Foxx]

Kind of a douchey thing to say when your profession is being an organic one of these;

[SCEN3RY]

There really is no need.

The guy's English isn't crisp at all, so no matter what the title of the video was, anybody watching it would have had their own interpretation of what he meant.

It was just funny to see you try and clean it up.

Well that's a fascinating take. Unless your interpretation was based strictly off the title you read, your explanation makes no sense. If his English is so unintelligible to you, what do you think I was trying to "clean up," if you're actually unaware of what he said?

[Zaroku]

He will collaborate with the poster who said Monroe figured out GGG, they're making another hit documentary with Netflix's financial backing. It's called "The Blueprint: Willie Monroe Jr vs Gennady Golovkin." It's going to be Netflix's first 8k resolution documentary, and actually the first ever 8k footage anywhere. You have to buy the only 8k tv available, Sharp's 8k TV which cost $130,000 dollars.

http://www.cnbc.com/2015/09/16/sharp...-for-133k.html

Apparently Spoon's hit show "Pacquiao actually beat Mayweather: Full Investigation" got Netflix's attention so they signed him to a three documentary deal. Monroe vs Golovkin: The Blueprint is the first in line in the deal. Spoon will be paid in rare Manny Pacquiao merchandise, like the now discontinued Pac Nike's and all other kinds of cool merch.

I saw a Japanese news show about it. I will wait for the Chinese to make the 800 dollar version. Spend the savings on j b1tches and love hotels.

[Robbie Barrett]

Pacquiao did say Lil G is worse than animals tbf.

[Razcal26]

Well that's a fascinating take. Unless your interpretation was based strictly off the title you read, your explanation makes no sense. If his English is so unintelligible to you, what do you think I was trying to "clean up," if you're actually unaware of what he said?

It actually makes perfect sense, you just seem to have this notion that there is one way to interpret what he said.

If you read through the thread right now, some of the responses to the video are:

"Uninteresting? Your level of comp is uninteresting"
"You can't talk since all your fights have been against bums"
"Pacquiao was fighting a top WW, who has this can crusher fought?"

Those are 3 types of responses that have been made in this thread alone based on that video, all different from your interpretation. According to you, there should have only been one interpretation........... but there wasn't was there?

Like I said, it was funny to see you try and clean it up.

[FeFist]

This is what happens when you hype up people who don't have a single great win to their name. They believe their own hype and feel they can turn their nose up at an actual legend.

[SCEN3RY]

It actually makes perfect sense, you just seem to have this notion that there is one way to interpret what he said.

If you read through the thread right now, some of the responses to the video are:

"Uninteresting? Your level of comp is uninteresting"
"You can't talk since all your fights have been against bums"
"Pacquiao was fighting a top WW, who has this can crusher fought?"

Those are 3 types of responses that have been made in this thread alone based on that video, all different from your interpretation. According to you, there should have only been one interpretation........... but there wasn't was there?

Like I said, it was funny to see you try and clean it up.

hahaha real quickly, I can't not point this out. Fine, whatever, my interpretation is wrong, but I don't think you're actually hearing by what means you've come to start this little argument. Let's try this in short sentences.

You don't have an interpretation of your own to draw. Golovkin is too unintelligible. But you can rely on the majority for their interpretation and disagree with others based on someone else's opinion. That's some flawed logic. If I create 10 alts and say something of the like, will you feel compelled to agree with me because now the popular vote has changed? Tsk, tsk, tsk, c'mon man, nsb can't have that much sway over you.