This crap will never end. I call for a rematch yet Floyd fans say it won't make a difference. However, we keep seeing posts like this, denigrating Pacquiao & others denigrating Mayweather. The fighters need to settle this, because the fans will never be able to.
What was the difference here, really
Collapse
-
lol. you don't even know what you're talking about. I suggest you read the posts from our starting conversation. When you're up to speed. Let me know!why duck the question?
kinda hard to convince the audience in floyd vs pac
but why did all hbo had manny winning in pac vs bradley 1 when u said score card favor bradley in that fight?
so hbo didnt wanna try to convince that manny won against floyd because of the audience but why would hbo try to convince that manny won against bradley in the 1st fight?
Comment
-
I don't care if they fight. It'd be another win by Floyd followed by more excuses. What's funnier is no reports on theoritical purses. Why would Floyd even offer anything close for all the drama HBO and Top Rank caused after the denial of losing. lol
I say 80/20, and that's Floyd being generous.Comment
-
stop trying to spin this.
u said pac vs bradley 1 score card favor bradley but hbo said pac won.
then u said floyd vs pac, hbo had to go with floyd being the winner because its kinda hard to convince the audience that manny won. so if that's the case, why would hbo try to convince the audience that manny won in the first bradley fight? lets hear it.Comment
-
now you're taking the piss with that alt. I get it. #48 brah!Originally posted by WSSDstop trying to spin this.
u said pac vs bradley 1 score card favor bradley but hbo said pac won.
then u said floyd vs pac, hbo had to go with floyd being the winner because its kinda hard to convince the audience that manny won. so if that's the case, why would hbo try to convince the audience that manny won in the first bradley fight? lets hear it.Comment
-
it's not getting into your thick skull. you were the one who brought up the double standards issue with oscar and floyd. but those two were different. one was actually caught doing IV, the other was just presumptions based on what one thinks were IV marks.Roach said he saw the tape and the IV marks. Why do you need tape over a common area that receives IV treatment?
All failed speculation 100%. Victor Conte could've easily helped Hauser's fiction on how to ''cheat'' from IV time to fight night. Hauser didn't write any of that.
When you can't find banned substances it sucks innit? So we just say ''IV's are illegal'' innit.
now, you say you're concluding oscar had IV based on why would he have tape over an area where you get IV? let's use that su****ious mindset and apply it to floyd who was ACTUALLY caught using IV. why would you get 750ml of IV if you weren't really dehydrated, no medical doctor confirmed it, and you were only 2-3lbs over the limit 30days out?
Comment
-
''caught.'' Yeah a person at a clinic is ''caught'' using an IV? Did you somehow forget the type of testing that was done? You'd think positive results would be shown when both are giving blood after the fight correct? Or did Floyd and Oscar somehow flush out concentrated substances that would benefit performance from within a day's time, where one only pissed in a cup, and the other - May vs Pac - CIR, HGH, EPO testing somehow is the weakest in detecting substances to find positive results?it's not getting into your thick skull. you were the one who brought up the double standards issue with oscar and floyd. but those two were different. one was actually caught doing IV, the other was just presumptions based on what one thinks were IV marks.
now, you say you're concluding oscar had IV based on why would he have tape over an area where you get IV? let's use that su****ious mindset and apply it to floyd who was ACTUALLY caught using IV. why would you get 750ml of IV if you weren't really dehydrated, no medical doctor confirmed it, and you were only 2-3lbs over the limit 30days out?

#48!Comment
-
Comment
Comment