Comments Thread For: Haye Questions Validity of Fury-Klitschko II Announcement
Collapse
-
How the **** would Klitschko have had the IBF belt after losing it to Fury? Were you dropped on your head as a baby?Comment
-
You must be ******ed mate, you claim Fury could have done both I said no he couldn't have, you probably lack an education so I would walk you through it slowly... If Fury didn't sign a rematch clause with Klits it meant he would walk away only with the belts that he was mandated to (WBA and WBO) if he beat Wlad, because the IBF belt would NOT be on the line, which means Wlad Klits would still have that BELT and can choose to defend it against Glazkov who IS the mandatory. Get it knob?! If you still don't get that then your parents failed you... No your education (If you had one failed you).
I like said in my very first post to you, you are NOT more clever than a whole boxing team.Comment
-
You must be ******ed mate, you claim Fury could have done both I said no he couldn't have, you probably lack an education so I would walk you through it slowly... If Fury didn't sign a rematch clause with Klits it meant he would walk away only with the belts that he was mandated to (WBA and WBO) if he beat Wlad, because the IBF belt would NOT be on the line, which means Wlad Klits would still have that BELT and can choose to defend it against Glazkov who IS the mandatory. Get it knob?! If you still don't get that then your parents failed you... No your education (If you had one failed you).
I like said in my very first post to you, you are NOT more clever than a whole boxing team.
It doesn't work like that, you dense c*nt. Whether he was mandatory or not, all of Wlad's belts were on the line. That's how it always works as long as you're willing to pay the sanctioning fee. Klitschko can't determine whether he wants a belt to be on the line or not.Last edited by Ham Porter; 04-13-2016, 08:27 PM.Comment
-
Then you are a complete ******, because it doesn't alway work like that. All the belts were on the line...That's why a rematch clause was put in lol moron. If Fury was the mandatory for all the belts then he had zero obligation to sign a rematch clause... God you are a ******!It doesn't work like that, you dense c*nt. Whether he was mandatory or not, all of Wlad's belts were on the line. That's how it always works as long as you're willing to pay the sanctioning fee. Klitschko can't determine whether he wants a belt to be on the line or not.Comment
-
Then you are a complete ******, because it doesn't alway work like that. All the belts were on the line...That's why a rematch clause was put in lol moron. If Fury was the mandatory for all the belts then he had zero obligation to sign a rematch clause... God you are a ******!
Yes, it does, you complete and utter dribbling ******. As long as the fighter pays the sanctioning fee, all the belts are on the line. Wade isn't mandatory for Golovkin's WBA belt, but that's still on the line.
Fury had zero obligation to sign a rematch clause, period. No one who is a mandatory has such an obligation and they never do so. Fury did because he's a ****ing idiot backed by idiots.Comment
-
Lol you are a complete ******, of course he would pay for a sanctioning fee he sign a rematch clause moron lol... He had zero obligation to sign a rematch for the WBO And WBA... If he didn't sign a rematch then the IBF belt would NOT be on the line, Wlad holds the belt and he would have to defend it period. Go study up on your boxing, you are NOT that clever, not sure how those little details escape you, you trying to act as if you know more than a whole boxing team, go tied your shoes or whatever you do in the hood moron.. Nice try doe trying to twist facts lol.Comment
-
Lol you are a complete ******, of course he would pay for a sanctioning fee he sign a rematch clause moron lol... He had zero obligation to sign a rematch for the WBO And WBA... If he didn't sign a rematch then the IBF belt would NOT be on the line, Wlad holds the belt and he would have to defend it period. Go study up on your boxing, you are NOT that clever, not sure how those little details escape you, you trying to act as if you know more than a whole boxing team, go tied your shoes or whatever you do in the hood moron.. Nice try doe trying to twist facts lol.
Go and look up how many mandatory challengers have signed rematch clauses and you'll realise how much of a ****ing idiot you are. Wlad's IBF belt was on the line regardless of whether Fury was mandatory or not. You can't pick and choose which belts you want to defend - what part of that are you struggling to grasp?
****ing hell, it's incredible to think someone could be this ****** or ******ed.Comment
-
Fury is NOT the mandatory for the IBF belt moron lol...Study up on your boxing, you are NOT that clever than a whole boxing team.
Comment
-
It's irrelevant whether he was, you ****** ****. I just gave you an example of a boxer who isn't mandatory for a certain body still fighting for that body's belt, and you've completely ignored it. Unified champions don't have the option of only putting certain belts on the line.
Now go ahead and list me all these mandatory challengers who've signed rematch clauses, f*ggot.Comment
Comment