Comments Thread For: Haye Questions Validity of Fury-Klitschko II Announcement

[yoz]

Says the guy who is looking to score a fight with Shannon Briggs...

[Ray*]

Fury was not an optional defence, regardless of him not being mandatory for the IBF.

You have being educated. Study up on your boxing...Not an optional but not a mandatory neither lol....****** alert!

[Ham Porter]

You have being educated. Study up on your boxing...Not an optional but not a mandatory neither lol....****** alert!

You're nearly 40 years old and you still communicate like a dribbling spastic. It's bad enough that I had to correct you on it once, yet you still persist in showcasing your key stage 1 level grammar.


Sanctioning bodies utilise a rotation system as far as organising mandatories for unified champions, Gay Ray - this is well documented to anyone with the slightest bit of interest in boxing. Fury was not an optional defence, period.

[Ray*]

Fury was not an optional defence..

And yet he had to sign a rematch clause lol, Yep your education was superb! Again you are NOT that clever. No mandatory fighter would be dumb enough to sign a rematch clause, this is what I have been trying to educate you about, but your lack of any education has blinded you to that little fact. Am sure you got it now but you are now too embarrass to backtrack so you are coming out with different stuff to lessen your dented ego.

Imagine a ****** like yourself, trying to criticise a whole team that surrounds a boxer because they sign a rematch clause. If Fury was the mandatory for all the belts he would NOT be dumb enough like yourself and sign one, Fury is NOT only a clever fighter in the ring but also a clever one outside of it, Again study up on your boxing and educate yourself before typing BS on here because someone might call you out on that BS like I have done.. Stay educated!

[Ham Porter]

And yet he had to sign a rematch clause lol,

And yet he didn't have to sign one, hence the universal confusion when he did. This never happens, hence me asking you to cite another example of a mandatory signing such a clause And yes, Fury's team are every bit as dumb as you are. He did it purely for financial incentives and nothing else.

You're an illiterate spazzer who isn't qualified to speak on anything boxing related. Stick to sucking off Mayweather and fighting with Pact*rds - that's more your level.

[Ray*]

And yet he didn't have to sign one.

Nope he didn't have to, that was already established as long as Wlad didn't have to be forced to defend the IBF belt against Fury. And according to the IBF website Fury was not a mandatory defence but an optional one, Again you are NOT that clever. I would make sure this get through your ******ed self, the only time I would give up on you would be when I know for sure you cannot be helped. Wlad used the loophole to tie Fury down to a rematch, Fury see it as a good thing and had confidence in his ability. No shame in that, what is shameful is an idiot on a forum claiming to be more clever than a boxer with a whole team behind him.

[Ham Porter]

Nope he didn't have to, that was already established as long as Wlad didn't have to be forced to defend the IBF belt against Fury. And according to the IBF website Fury was not a mandatory defence but an optional one, Again you are NOT that clever. I would make sure this get through your ******ed self, the only time I would give up on you would be when I know for sure you cannot be helped. Wlad used the loophole to tie Fury down to a rematch, Fury see it as a good thing and had confidence in his ability. No shame in that, what is shameful is an idiot on a forum claiming to be more clever than a boxer with a whole team behind him.

No mandatory challenger in recent memory has signed a rematch clause, and there's a reason for that. What Fury did was out of the ordinary and puzzling to everyone. I've already explained the rotation system the alphabet bodies use for unified champions; if you're still struggling to grasp that, too bad.

And yes, I am absolutely 100% more clever than a team full of inbred *****s and the single worst promoter in boxing history in Fat Mick Hennessy.

[Ray*]

No mandatory challenger in recent memory has signed a rematch clause, and there's a reason for that.

Thank you, there is hope for you after all. Signing a rematch clause when you can make more money if you didn't does NOT make any sense, Fury obviously wanted all the belts and probably thought he could beat Klits and get to defend all the belts against Glazkov but Wlad is a smart guy and exercising the immediate rematch clause ruled that out for Fury. Not mandatory challenger in a great position would sign a rematch clause unless they put a gun to his head.

[Ham Porter]

Thank you, there is hope for you after all. Signing a rematch clause when you can make more money if you didn't does NOT make any sense, Fury obviously wanted all the belts and probably thought he could beat Klits and get to defend all the belts against Glazkov but Wlad is a smart guy and exercising the immediate rematch clause ruled that out for Fury. Not mandatory challenger in a great position would sign a rematch clause unless they put a gun to his head.

You're assuming that the only way a guy could possibly sign such a clause was if he were somehow forced to, ignoring the fact that Fury is a moron and his team are useless.

Fury knew he couldn't defend against Glazkov from the very start. He signed the rematch clause because it meant him making more than Wlad in a rematch. It was a decision motivated purely by money.