Kell Brook vs Amir Khan - Breakdown of assets

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LacedUp
    Still Smokin'
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 29171
    • 781
    • 381
    • 132,163

    #41
    Originally posted by FrankieBruno
    Khan has better hand speed, accuracy, footwork, footspeed...


    Phew... that was good.

    Comment

    • mani1
      Interim Champion
      • May 2010
      • 980
      • 12
      • 0
      • 11,574

      #42
      Also as for average resumes who has Bute beaten who has abraham beaten who had Pascal beaten who had Taylor beaten at 168 how shot was kessler? yet you proclaim this vacant title paper champ as an atg lol

      Comment

      • LacedUp
        Still Smokin'
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 29171
        • 781
        • 381
        • 132,163

        #43
        Originally posted by Box-Office
        Even stamina?


        If you look at the pace Khan keeps for 12.
        eh what?

        that's absolutely terrible. Khan has a strong tendency to gas in all of his fights against guys who fight back.

        Kotelnik, Maidana, Diaz, Peterson, Algieri.. The list is long. His stamina has never been proven good.

        Unless you think that punching the cement footed Devon Alexander around the ring for 12 rounds is anything special.

        Brook showed better stamina against Porter than Khan has in any of his fights against top guys.

        Comment

        • LacedUp
          Still Smokin'
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 29171
          • 781
          • 381
          • 132,163

          #44
          Originally posted by IronDanHamza
          Khan would definitely by the betting favourite if they fought.
          I definitely don't think so.

          Especially after Khan's fight with Canelo - But it was a joke with regards to the odds. People just don't get trolling these days.

          I actually think Khan will win against Canelo if he's focused. But I also think Brook would beat Canelo.

          Comment

          • Razcal26
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Oct 2015
            • 1165
            • 54
            • 5
            • 7,894

            #45
            Where did this notion come from that Khan has good footwork?

            It is abysmal.

            Comment

            • gmc_rfc_06
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Oct 2010
              • 9486
              • 282
              • 131
              • 16,947

              #46
              Originally posted by Razcal26
              Where did this notion come from that Khan has good footwork?

              It is abysmal.
              No clue.

              Fast feet doesn't mean good footwork, he's like Bambi on ice at times. His balance and footwork are nowhere near that of Brook.

              To suggest his accuracy is better is the funniest of all

              Comment

              • LacedUp
                Still Smokin'
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 29171
                • 781
                • 381
                • 132,163

                #47
                Originally posted by mani1
                Porter couldn't even beat Diaz needed 2 attempts before he fought Brook
                At least he didn't look like bambi on ice for 5 rounds

                Comment

                • mani1
                  Interim Champion
                  • May 2010
                  • 980
                  • 12
                  • 0
                  • 11,574

                  #48
                  Originally posted by LacedUp
                  At least he didn't look like bambi on ice for 5 rounds
                  At least he won. Also that is the reason why the coward Brook who hasn't fought a puncher in over a decade wants to fight Khan he can't punch and he can't take a punch.

                  Comment

                  • LacedUp
                    Still Smokin'
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 29171
                    • 781
                    • 381
                    • 132,163

                    #49
                    Originally posted by mani1
                    At least he won. Also that is the reason why the coward Brook who hasn't fought a puncher in over a decade wants to fight Khan he can't punch and he can't take a punch.
                    Yeah sure

                    Comment

                    • IronDanHamza
                      BoxingScene Icon
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 49501
                      • 5,032
                      • 270
                      • 104,043

                      #50
                      Originally posted by LacedUp
                      I definitely don't think so.

                      Especially after Khan's fight with Canelo - But it was a joke with regards to the odds. People just don't get trolling these days.

                      I actually think Khan will win against Canelo if he's focused. But I also think Brook would beat Canelo.
                      If he loses to Canelo brutally then maybe but even still I think he probably would be. He defintely would be as it stands, I'd bet the bank on that.

                      I think Khan's got a shot too. Slim one but a shot. I'm going to be attending it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP