Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Abel Sanchez responds to Mayweather "gg fighting Ward is taking a step back"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Abel Sanchez responds to Mayweather "gg fighting Ward is taking a step back"


  • #2
    What. An. Idiot.

    But fighting Wade, Froch or JCC.Jr is a step up?

    Just STFU. This idiot must have an account here.

    Comment


    • #3
      He said he would have to move up to move down and that would be ******, which it would be. And then they ask about Froch which was on the table like two years ago like that's relevant now especially with Canelo being mandatory.

      So you guys think it's fine for Golovkin to move up to 168 (or 175) then move down to 154 to fight Mayweather? lol ok like any fighter ever is asked to do that
      Last edited by ИATAS; 03-27-2016, 01:24 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by ИATAS View Post
        He said he would have to move up to move down and that would be ******, which it would be.

        So you guys think it's fine for Golovkin to move up to 168 (or 175) then move down to 154 to fight Mayweather? lol ok like any fighter ever is asked to do that
        He also said that GGG would be willing to move up to fight Froch or JCC JR and be OK with moving back down to fight Floyd.

        So, what now?

        Comment


        • #5
          Yes after fighting an all time great like lemieux , ward is a step back.

          Comment


          • #6
            We get it, Abel... Don't worry, the big boys are on a collision course against one another. Kov and Ward.

            Let's keep seeing your magic work against the Dominique Wade's of the world.

            Comment


            • #7
              Post the fight hype vid of Abel saying he'd fight kell brook guy is a ten times bigger douche than roach ever was

              How you gonna clown khanelo then say that?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Razcal26 View Post
                He also said that GGG would be willing to move up to fight Froch or JCC JR and be OK with moving back down to fight Floyd.

                So, what now?
                He was talking about two different things. Froch was a fight they were thinking about 1-2 years ago when Golovkin was begging for fights when he couldn't even land a title unification at 160. Froch is retired now. Abel doesn't respond to the questions well though and falls for the trap. Obviously Golovkin isn't going to move up to 168-175 for Ward now while they are going after Canelo or even Saunders next, then move down to 154 to fight Floyd lol. All these hypotheticals that aren't reality (Ward is at 175 now and going after Kovalev who says Ward would drop down to 168 himself? And Floyd isn't coming back to fight Golovkin).

                Comment


                • #9
                  I was hoping to come into this thread to call Abel an idiot, but.....

                  Originally posted by ИATAS View Post
                  He said he would have to move up to move down and that would be ******, which it would be. And then they ask about Froch which was on the table like two years ago like that's relevant now especially with Canelo being mandatory.

                  So you guys think it's fine for Golovkin to move up to 168 (or 175) then move down to 154 to fight Mayweather? lol ok like any fighter ever is asked to do that
                  ...this pretty much sums up what he was talking about in context. To get a Mayweather fight moving up to fight Ward is a step back due to the hardship of going back down. Thats the actual context. Nice clickbait title doe.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
                    I was hoping to come into this thread to call Abel an idiot, but.....



                    ...this pretty much sums up what he was talking about in context. To get a Mayweather fight moving up to fight Ward is a step back due to the hardship of going back down. Thats the actual context. Nice clickbait title doe.
                    Exactly. The context is what's important here, but people hear what they want to hear and suspend reality.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP