Arrogant or Humble Fighters? Which do you like more and why?
Collapse
-
-
I answered "both" in the poll but I tend to prefer humble fighters too.Well, personally I prefer a humble fighter who doesn't talk outside the ring much and can back up it up with actions.
Though I do find some arrogant fighters who brash and trash talk a lot seem to be hilarious and entertaining, but there is a point where they take it too far and knowing when to turn it off.
I would say I like humble fighters more _b
The only time I like an arrogant fighter is when he's dishing on a fighter that is a bigger piece of ****. Like the way Kovalev ripped on Stevenson.
Kovalev is a fighter I kind of like but sometimes I think he's going to say or do something in the future that will make me hate him. Not sure if he's a heartless b@stard or he's just a bit rough around the edges. I like that he fights to hurt his opponent but I would like to think he's not such a bad guy outside of the ring.Comment
-


That is blasphemy sir.
One is a living legend who surpassed his sport as an icon to the world, with his anti war message and the other is a leprechaun with cauliflower ears who roll's around in a cage in front of a load of pissed rednecks after telling us all how rich/amazing he is
Comment
-
Comment
-
Arrogant, no doubt.
This is sports. You're competing to be the best. This is Boxing where the end goal is to literally go in there and assert your dominance over your opponent bu making him look ******.
Don't have time for that humility crap. Seems so phony.Comment
-
Arrogant is more fun to watch/entertaining. I identify more with the humble guys doe. I got respect for anyone who gets into the ring & I tend to think people act in a way that is best for them. And some guys need to hold their breath while walking thru the graveyard & some need to whistle walking thru the graveyard. Just different types of people with different means of trying to get where they wanna be.Comment

Comment