Comments Thread For: De La Hoya: I'm Confident Canelo vs. Golovkin Will Happen!

[kafkod]

In Sept at 160lbs.

Let's see the 2 best men in the MW division fight for the lineal title without any marinating, draining, and "A side" bull****.

[LOCOMEX89]

Point Blank the proof will be the 15 days after the Khan vs Canelo fight if Golden Boy and K2 come to an agreement to fight in September.

Until that time frame it's pointless to keep bringing the topic up. They both have VOLUNTARY DEFENESES so it's time to move on from this headline.

[mick1303]

Point Blank the proof will be the 15 days after the Khan vs Canelo fight if Golden Boy and K2 come to an agreement to fight in September.

Until that time frame it's pointless to keep bringing the topic up. They both have VOLUNTARY DEFENESES so it's time to move on from this headline.

For GGG it is not voluntary. Wade is his IBF mandatory

[turnedup]

Yeah, meeting with Jones was a nice way to buy yourself sometime but that fight isn't happening this year or the next..it is what it is. If Margarito looks good in his comeback, wouldn't be surprised to see him get a shot at Canelo before Golovkin.

[ThomasJK]

This is what gets to me. The sanctioning body has given them both 'interim' title defense opportunities, and then they must face each other. Ok that's fine and Dandy, but here so, how can they put in an 'immediate' rematch clause on the Kahn/Canelo fight when it has been clearly stated by the sanctioning body that they (GGG and Canelo) Must face each other next. Whether their future middle weight title/unification fight is an actual title defense or not, the fight should go on as mandated, and any contractual clause thereafter made between any other fighter should be null and void. Not that I think Kahn is going to beat Canelo, but just on principle, this type of contract undermining of the sanctioning bodies is in poor taste and bad for the sport. I think it safe to say that on a slight chance that Kahn would come out with a win, he would probably pull a Canelo and "blow job" Saunders move and run away from a bout with GGG anyways.

[about.thousands]

This is what gets to me. The sanctioning body has given them both 'interim' title defense opportunities, and then they must face each other. Ok that's fine and Dandy, but here so, how can they put in an 'immediate' rematch clause on the Kahn/Canelo fight when it has been clearly stated by the sanctioning body that they (GGG and Canelo) Must face each other next. Whether their future middle weight title fight is an actual title defense or not, the fight should go on as mandated, and any contractual clause thereafter made between any other fighter should be null and void. Not that I think Kahn is going to beat Canelo, but just on principle, this type of contract undermining of the sanctioning bodies is in poor taste and bad for the sport.ninthink it safe to say that on a slight chance that Kahn would come out with a win, he would probably pull a Canelo and "blow job" Saunders move and run away from a bout with GGG anyways.

If Canelo losses he'll fight Khan again. It won't be for the title but he'll fight him again.

[bopbopbbe]

Yeah, meeting with Jones was a nice way to buy yourself sometime but that fight isn't happening this year or the next..it is what it is. If Margarito looks good in his comeback, wouldn't be surprised to see him get a shot at Canelo before Golovkin.

LOL good call. It's absolutely sickening but Canelo clearly has zero shame. Fraud ass mo****a.

[kafkod]

This is what gets to me. The sanctioning body has given them both 'interim' title defense opportunities, and then they must face each other. Ok that's fine and Dandy, but here so, how can they put in an 'immediate' rematch clause on the Kahn/Canelo fight when it has been clearly stated by the sanctioning body that they (GGG and Canelo) Must face each other next. Whether their future middle weight title/unification fight is an actual title defense or not, the fight should go on as mandated, and any contractual clause thereafter made between any other fighter should be null and void. Not that I think Kahn is going to beat Canelo, but just on principle, this type of contract undermining of the sanctioning bodies is in poor taste and bad for the sport. I think it safe to say that on a slight chance that Kahn would come out with a win, he would probably pull a Canelo and "blow job" Saunders move and run away from a bout with GGG anyways.

The WBC ruling states that the winner has 15 days to agree to fight Golovkin next. If he wants to fight anybody else, or rematch the loser, he must relinquish the title first.

If Khan beats Canelo, I'm sure there will be a rematch, but it won't be for the WBC title unless GGG agrees to step aside again, and I can't see him doing that.

[Zaroku]

Hope so Oscar.... Keep it real player... Fishnets and freaky-ness, just give us fights that matter...

Back to my safe space.... Where only my girl & chihuahua dogs support me in my safe space....

[HanzGruber]

this place might blow up if they dont fight in sept.. people would still defend canelo too