First sentence: True.
Second sentence: true. She was vulnerable to punches, always has been. McMann and Tate both rocked her on the regular but didn't have enough skill to capitalize. If Rousey didn't get a takedown, she was taking damage throughout the fight. That's all she had.
Third sentence: partially true. While she was a one-trick, I don't agree that the division is full of "bums". Cat Zingano should not have lost that fight, she's got more strike power than Holm, but Cat had a ****** strategy. That's why SHE lost.
Correia lost because she got intimidated in the cage.
Both of them lost because emotions got in the way. Holm won for 1 reason: she stayed cool and calm and didn't get worked up over Rousey's phony intimidation tactics.
You watched a piss poor example.
If you want to see mat dominance watch old Megumi Fujii fights.
If you want to see straight up violence and heart, watch Namajunas/VanZant.
If you want to see a girl that can punch properly, watch Joanna Jedrzejczyk.
Second sentence: true. She was vulnerable to punches, always has been. McMann and Tate both rocked her on the regular but didn't have enough skill to capitalize. If Rousey didn't get a takedown, she was taking damage throughout the fight. That's all she had.
Third sentence: partially true. While she was a one-trick, I don't agree that the division is full of "bums". Cat Zingano should not have lost that fight, she's got more strike power than Holm, but Cat had a ****** strategy. That's why SHE lost.
Correia lost because she got intimidated in the cage.
Both of them lost because emotions got in the way. Holm won for 1 reason: she stayed cool and calm and didn't get worked up over Rousey's phony intimidation tactics.
You watched a piss poor example.
If you want to see mat dominance watch old Megumi Fujii fights.
If you want to see straight up violence and heart, watch Namajunas/VanZant.
If you want to see a girl that can punch properly, watch Joanna Jedrzejczyk.
Comment