He's not close to retiring so this this thread is an irrelevant hypothetical
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Face the facts, If Golovkin retired after his next fight...
Collapse
-
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Redd Foxx View PostDon't see how you came up with that. He's around 34. Most boxers start to age rapidly at that point. You can't act like everyone is a Hopkins.
I would also think with him becoming a pretty major draw that the big fights are going to start happening for him. Canelo will really lose his credibility if he goes too long without fighting him.
He's probably not in the Hall of Fame quite yet. But in another year or 2, I'd bet he is.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rich2123 View PostGGG seems pretty well preserved. He's barely lost a round. A lot of elite fighters fight at a high level into their late 30's, so I'd bet GGG has a good 3-4 years at this level left.
I would also think with him becoming a pretty major draw that the big fights are going to start happening for him. Canelo will really lose his credibility if he goes too long without fighting him.
He's probably not in the Hall of Fame quite yet. But in another year or 2, I'd bet he is.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Redd Foxx View PostYou say "fight at this level". At can-crushing level? Sure! Taking on real competition at that age is what ages a fighter overnight. No, not "a lot" of fighters fight at a high-level into their late 30's and those that do are considered elite. How is Golovkin elite? Who has he beaten to be considered elite? Even Wilder has 1 name on his resume. Until he Genady faces a challenge he's potentially another Bute, Price, etc. I like the guy as a fighter and am not wishing him any ill will, but let's stop giving undeserved credit and stop pretending he's accomplished anything other than being entertaining.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Redd Foxx View PostDon't see how you came up with that. He's around 34. Most boxers start to age rapidly at that point. You can't act like everyone is a Hopkins.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HeroBando View PostNo you don't like him, why lie? Wilder has a name on his resume? Who's that, and what makes him more of a name that 7 on Gggs resume?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Redd Foxx View PostYou say "fight at this level". At can-crushing level? Sure! Taking on real competition at that age is what ages a fighter overnight. No, not "a lot" of fighters fight at a high-level into their late 30's and those that do are considered elite. How is Golovkin elite? Who has he beaten to be considered elite? Even Wilder has 1 name on his resume. Until he Genady faces a challenge he's potentially another Bute, Price, etc. I like the guy as a fighter and am not wishing him any ill will, but let's stop giving undeserved credit and stop pretending he's accomplished anything other than being entertaining.
However, I think he is past the level of Bute, Price and even Wilder. Most of the guys GGG has fought were in the top 10 in his division. He's in a weak division, sure, but if he's making top 10 guys look like cans, don't you think that says something about how good he is?
And I would certainly think at least Martin Murray and David Lemiux were comparable to Bermaine Stiverne. His best win, and only notable win, is Arreola. It's not like Wilder fought Klitchko or something. Or is Spzilka the name on Wilders resume?
Comment
Comment