Why do Fans Get Upset When Fighters are Willing to Fight Their Favorite Fighter?
Collapse
-
-
That's just ******. Lara's last three fights were Ishe Smith, Delvin Rodriguez, Jan Zaveck. Are those the kind of fights you would make if you have the skill you're claiming Lara has?Comment
-
Lara best win is Angulo who knocked out by Kirkland who got knockout by Ishida. Now how can Lara be better when Ishida wouldn't even be considered a top five win on his resume.Comment
-
Well of course you're going to get mad. You are guilty of doing this. You discredit every potential opponent.Comment
-
I didn't discredit Lara, I just keep it real the guy resume isn't near GGG's. If you count actual wins he doesn't even compare.
Like I said Angulo is his best win and he's no better than Ishida who wouldn't even be considered a top five win on GGG's resume. If you can't deal with the truth that's you're problem.
If you want to **** on GGG's resume go right ahead but don't forget to mention that it's better than Lara's.
But even still resumes don't win fights and GGG would still curb stomp Lara with about as much ease as Geale and Macklin.
So resume wise GGG ****s on Lara and in the ring GGG would **** on Lara.Comment
-
Discredit, like how you discredit Geale, Murray, Macklin, and Lemule.
I didn't discredit Lara, I just keep it real the guy resume isn't near GGG's. If you count actual wins he doesn't even compare.
Like I said Angulo is his best win and he's no better than Ishida who wouldn't even be considered a top five win on GGG's resume. If you can't deal with the truth that's you're problem.
If you want to **** on GGG's resume go right ahead but don't forget to mention that it's better than Lara's.
But even still resumes don't win fights and GGG would still curb stomp Lara with about as much ease as Geale and Macklin.
So resume wise GGG ****s on Lara and in the ring GGG would **** on Lara.Comment
-
Discredit, like how you discredit Geale, Murray, Macklin, and Lemule.
I didn't discredit Lara, I just keep it real the guy resume isn't near GGG's. If you count actual wins he doesn't even compare.
Like I said Angulo is his best win and he's no better than Ishida who wouldn't even be considered a top five win on GGG's resume. If you can't deal with the truth that's you're problem.
If you want to **** on GGG's resume go right ahead but don't forget to mention that it's better than Lara's.
But even still resumes don't win fights and GGG would still curb stomp Lara with about as much ease as Geale and Macklin.
So resume wise GGG ****s on Lara and in the ring GGG would **** on Lara.
I thought most of us were in an agreement that GGG beat Geale and as you stated Lemule. that's 2...
Lara: Alvarez, Trout, Williams, Smith, Molina, Zaveck.
I mean dat Work must count for something. Like when the boxing world went crazy or referenced Khan beating an old ass Barrera or Garcia and Maidana beating an old ass Morales.Comment
-
Because after Pac, Donaire, Matthysse, and Pac again all lost their biggest fights over the past few years it has that bandwagon shook. They're scared for Golovkin to fight anyone people think poses a stylistic difficulty to him because all their other champions the last few years failed them.Comment
-
Discredit, like how you discredit Geale, Murray, Macklin, and Lemule.
I didn't discredit Lara, I just keep it real the guy resume isn't near GGG's. If you count actual wins he doesn't even compare.
Like I said Angulo is his best win and he's no better than Ishida who wouldn't even be considered a top five win on GGG's resume. If you can't deal with the truth that's you're problem.
If you want to **** on GGG's resume go right ahead but don't forget to mention that it's better than Lara's.
But even still resumes don't win fights and GGG would still curb stomp Lara with about as much ease as Geale and Macklin.
So resume wise GGG ****s on Lara and in the ring GGG would **** on Lara.
Lara best win is trout who ggg best win?Comment
Comment