Comments Thread For: Canelo is Proud of His Resume, Says Golovkin Fight Will Happen

[Irony123]

He is wrong in BOTH instances.

He pulled the catchweight on Ward, because it benefited him..... and now he is insisting upon 160, because it benefits him.

Golovkin does not give a flying fat fk about the integrity of boxing..... and neither do you son..... you are taking this position, simply because it benefits Golovkin.

Develop some pride.

He is attempting to use weight to gain an advantage over his opposition.

If it was reasonable for Ward to negotiate with him, like he expected..... then it is reasonable for him to negotiate with Canelo.

He is taking this stance, because he knows that he has a whole lot of casual fanboys who will always have his back

so what you are saying because it benefits him its the wrong thing? everyone does or tries to do what benefits them. or do you go around doing things that don't benefit you? When does any fighter do anything that doesn't benefit them? you must hate Mayweather and Ward because all they do is what benefits them, Mayweather did a catchweight vs. Canelo yet came overweight for marques, chose gloves for Maidana... what a saint.

[Raonic]

He is wrong in BOTH instances.

He pulled the catchweight on Ward, because it benefited him..... and now he is insisting upon 160, because it benefits him.

Golovkin does not give a flying fat fk about the integrity of boxing..... and neither do you son..... you are taking this position, simply because it benefits Golovkin.

Develop some pride.

He is attempting to use weight to gain an advantage over his opposition.

If it was reasonable for Ward to negotiate with him, like he expected..... then it is reasonable for him to negotiate with Canelo.

He is taking this stance, because he knows that he has a whole lot of casual fanboys who will always have his back

Are you ******ed? That's my ****ing point. In a Ward 164 thread, you can't ****ing pull "CWs shouldn't exist" then in a Canelo 155 say "you should accept the CW". All you're doing there is egging him for being hypocritical (which he has been), as opposed to actually looking at each situation. If you think CWs shouldn't exist, then he's wrong in 1 instance (164 vs Ward) but right in another instance (160 vs Canelo). Just because he's been hypocritical doesn't suddenly make him wrong in both instances.

And how the hell can I be taking his position regardless when I outright said he's been hypocritical in his negotiations and have outright criticized him for things I don't believe in that he does?

[aboutfkntime]

so what you are saying because it benefits him its the wrong thing? everyone does or tries to do what benefits them. or do you go around doing things that don't benefit you? When does any fighter do anything that doesn't benefit them? you must hate Mayweather and Ward because all they do is what benefits them, Mayweather did a catchweight vs. Canelo yet came overweight for marques, chose gloves for Maidana... what a saint.

When it makes you a hypocrite.... yes !

[aboutfkntime]

Are you ******ed? That's my ****ing point. In a Ward 164 thread, you can't ****ing pull "CWs shouldn't exist" then in a Canelo 155 say "you should accept the CW". All you're doing there is egging him for being hypocritical (which he has been), as opposed to actually looking at each situation. If you think CWs shouldn't exist, then he's wrong in 1 instance (164 vs Ward) but right in another instance (160 vs Canelo). Just because he's been hypocritical doesn't suddenly make him wrong in both instances.

And how the hell can I be taking his position regardless when I outright said he's been hypocritical in his negotiations and have outright criticized him for things I don't believe in that he does?

If you play with fire, you get burnt.

I found it funny..... and you didn't.

Let's just leave it there kid.

I found it funny, in the exact same way that I found fatass Lemieux missing a CATCH-WEIGHT about 2 days after bashing Canelo for using canelo-weight..... very funny.

Lemieux may have been right, but that doesn't make the egg on his face look any less funny LMAO.... just like Golovkin may be right insisting on 160, but it makes him look like a fool after stating for THREE YEARS that he can beat anyone from 154-168, and then avoiding fights with Ward/Lara/Canelo.

[Raonic]

If you play with fire, you get burnt.

I found it funny..... and you didn't.

Let's just leave it there kid.

I found it funny, in the exact same way that I found fatass Lemieux missing a CATCH-WEIGHT about 2 days after bashing Canelo for using canelo-weight..... very funny.

Lemieux may have been right, but that doesn't make the egg on his face look any less funny LMAO.... just like Golovkin may be right insisting on 160, but it makes him look like a fool after stating for THREE YEARS that he can beat anyone from 154-168, and then avoiding fights with Ward/Lara/Canelo.

What the **** does that have to do with being wrong? He's being given what he's tried to serve? I get it, I've mentioned it's hypocritical.

It has nothing to do with whether it's funny or not. I could give a **** if it's funny to people . Because whether it is funny or not, it doesn't suddenly make you WRONG (which is what you keep arguing). Whether it's hypocritical or not, it doesn't make him WRONG.

[aboutfkntime]

What the **** does that have to do with being wrong? He's being given what he's tried to serve? I get it, I've mentioned it's hypocritical.

It has nothing to do with whether it's funny or not. I could give a **** if it's funny to people . Because whether it is funny or not, it doesn't suddenly make you WRONG (which is what you keep arguing). Whether it's hypocritical or not, it doesn't make him WRONG.

Bull****, don't be fkn ridiculous.

What sort of clown would argue that being hypocritical is not wrong ?

It was wrong for Golovkin to talk utter **** for THREE FKN YEARS, knowing full well that he had no intention whatsoever of backing up those wild claims.

Because of those wild claims, it was wrong for Golovkin to pull that b1tch-move with Ward.

Because of those wild claims, It was wrong for Golovkin to duck Lara, and then state that the decision to fight Willie Monroe instead of Lara was made because "Monroe is a bigger draw".

Because of those wild claims, it was wrong for Golovkin to totally refuse to negotiate with Canelo, and then attempt to justify that refusal by insinuating that he is concerned about the integrity of boxing..... because neither of those guys give a flying fat fcuk about the integrity of boxing, Golovkin is ONLY taking that position because it benefits him.

It is wrong for Golovkin to **** on his fans, and think they will forget.

It is wrong of you to blindly support that protected fighter, just because you like him

I say grow up, and develop some pride..... YOU KNOW that Golovkin doesn't give a fat rat's ass about the integrity of boxing, and yet you are more than happy to support him as he spins that bull**** to the fans, simply because it benefits him.

You are either ****** or dishonest.

This is how genuine boxing fans see the situation......
..... oh, and the very best fighter on the planet agree's with them.

[Jubei]

How do some you guys still not have that ****** on ignore? Do yourself a favor.

[aboutfkntime]

Raonic, the only thing more ridiculous than you attempting to convince me that being a hypocrite is not wrong..... is kafkod, attempting to convince me that Mr 97k doesn't need a name opponent

[aboutfkntime]

How do some you guys still not have that ****** on ignore? Do yourself a favor.

STFU pacstain.

You talked utter **** for FIVE YEARS !!

And, guess what..... you were wrong !

Silly casual fans WHO ARE WRONG, do not have a relevant opinion.

To this day, I've never seen you make an actual post with boxing content.

You whine, you cry, and you suck off hype-jobs.

THAT, is your calling, casual fan..... and, you do it well.

Get back to your basement you hateful ignorant little troll.

[techliam]

Raonic, the only thing more ridiculous than you attempting to convince me that being a hypocrite is not wrong..... is kafkod, attempting to convince me that Mr 97k doesn't need a name opponent

Sure, but can we stop pretending like 150k, against unknown limited Lemieux, in a first PPV event, as a Kazakh who can't speak english very well, is a huge flop of biblical proportions. Its not a huge huge success, but it really isn't that bad.

I bet Canelo-Lemiuex would do around 300k buys, its not going to be a triumph. So whilst Canelo is clearly the more popular fighter, theres not a huge gap, not nearly as big as the typical anti-GGG posters like to spew out. Demanding 155 against Golovkin is unreasonable unless the purse split is close to even