Comments Thread For: Golovkin: Canelo Alvarez vs. Amir Khan is a Business Fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -Kev-
    this is boxing
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2006
    • 39914
    • 5,025
    • 1,447
    • 234,543

    #41
    Originally posted by Szef
    And I stand by what I said, even if he does, it doesn't matter.
    So your argument is...what exactly? I just said Khan will look more competitive. Not sure how that's '******', when the context of the post is clear, that i'm not saying Khan will win, just look more competitive. So, both will win, okay? Can't someone point out which fight will look more competitive? That's actually not ******, it's an observation that may end up being true. Will it matter, of course it will. Khan's performance will matter even in losing. If he gives a good account of himself in losing competitively, that would raise his stock. So yeah it matters, and no it's not ******.

    Comment

    • b00g13man
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2012
      • 12197
      • 265
      • 51
      • 34,905

      #42
      Originally posted by spanishboxing
      So GGG vs Khan would be a great fight? All would be trashing 3G if he would pick khan as his opponent..khan would get KO by every fighter 3G fought..khan would be 3G biggest name. .but not biggest win. .khan is a WW...Canelo vs Wade would be better fight than khan ..not better event..but fight yes..Wade is a mandatory. .khan is joke..both mismatches. .but it's funny that Canelo is only a 2/1 favorite..what would be da odds of 3G vs Khan?
      Obviously a bit of hyperbole on my part. The point is it would be one of his top wins. That's how bad his resume is.

      Comment

      • Szef
        Face of Boxing
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Feb 2012
        • 15010
        • 2,485
        • 1,554
        • 253,303

        #43
        Originally posted by -Kev-
        So your argument is...what exactly? I just said Khan will look more competitive. Not sure how that's '******', when the context of the post is clear, that i'm not saying Khan will win, just look more competitive. So, both will win, okay? Can't someone point out which fight will look more competitive? That's actually not ******, it's an observation that may end up being true. Will it matter, of course it will. Khan's performance will matter even in losing. If he gives a good account of himself in losing competitively, that would raise his stock. So yeah it matters, and no it's not ******.
        My argument is this...Arguing over which fight will be more competitive or which one is worse in the context of the potential GGG - Canelo fight is some ******ed form of a pissing contest.

        Both Canelo and Golovkin are fighting huge underdogs and if they do anything less than completely dismantle them people will stop *****ing like they always do.

        And if Khan (who's a perfect stylistic match-up for Canelo to shine against btw), will look somehow competitive it won't mean that this fight was better to begin with. It will mean that Canelo is not as good as we thought he was and it will also mean that he's been fighting at his own made up weight class for a reason: he's afraid of what fighters his own size would do to him.
        Last edited by Szef; 02-17-2016, 11:04 AM.

        Comment

        • Szef
          Face of Boxing
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Feb 2012
          • 15010
          • 2,485
          • 1,554
          • 253,303

          #44
          Originally posted by b00g13man
          Obviously a bit of hyperbole on my part. The point is it would be one of his top wins. That's how bad his resume is.
          No. It would be one of the top names, not wins on his resume.

          Comment

          • spanishboxing
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Jan 2015
            • 176
            • 5
            • 0
            • 6,252

            #45
            Originally posted by -Kev-
            I stand by what I said, Khan will look more competitive vs Canelo than Wade will look vs GGG.
            Well that's mainly bc Canelo can't deal with movement since he can't cut da ring off n is slow..so da fact that u think Khanelo will be competitive says alot about Canelo skills..bc khan vs GGG isn't competitive. .khan would have no chance but u saying he does vs Canelo..3G vs wade is 2 mw ..Khanelo is a WW vs a MW at 155.. isn't a respectable fight..just 2 name fighters...canelo vs a Jr MW would be respectable at least.

            Comment

            • spanishboxing
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jan 2015
              • 176
              • 5
              • 0
              • 6,252

              #46
              Originally posted by Szef
              My argument is this...Arguing over which fight will be more competitive or which one is worse in the context of the potential GGG - Canelo fight is some ******ed form of a pissing contest.

              Both Canelo and Golovkin are fighting huge underdogs and if they do anything less than completely dismantle them people will stop *****ing like they always do.

              And if Khan (who's a perfect stylistic match-up for Canelo to shine against btw), will look somehow competitive it won't mean that this fight was better to begin with. It will mean that Canelo is not as good as we thought he was and it will also mean that he's been fighting at his own made up weight class for a reason: he's afraid of what fighters his own size would do to him.
              Agree..exactly what I say about Canelo...it's not just GGG. .fighters his size in general.

              Comment

              • spanishboxing
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Jan 2015
                • 176
                • 5
                • 0
                • 6,252

                #47
                Originally posted by b00g13man
                Obviously a bit of hyperbole on my part. The point is it would be one of his top wins. That's how bad his resume is.
                GGG resume isn't bad..it just doesn't have a big name..if he fights khan that would be a name ..but it still won't help his resume since Khan is a WW..Canelo doesn't even want to fight some of those guys on 3G resume since he pick Khan a WW. .ppl hear khan name n 4get he's a WW. ..Khanelo is a joke..so is 3G vs wade but wade is a mandatory fight..he don't fight him he gets strip..

                Comment

                • b00g13man
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2012
                  • 12197
                  • 265
                  • 51
                  • 34,905

                  #48
                  Originally posted by spanishboxing
                  GGG resume isn't bad..it just doesn't have a big name..if he fights khan that would be a name ..but it still won't help his resume since Khan is a WW..Canelo doesn't even want to fight some of those guys on 3G resume since he pick Khan a WW. .ppl hear khan name n 4get he's a WW. ..Khanelo is a joke..so is 3G vs wade but wade is a mandatory fight..he don't fight him he gets strip..
                  It's absolutely horrific. Let's not kid ourselves here.

                  Comment

                  • -PBP-
                    32 Time World Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2012
                    • 24107
                    • 836
                    • 635
                    • 34,297

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Szef
                    My argument is this...Arguing over which fight will be more competitive or which one is worse in the context of the potential GGG - Canelo fight is some ******ed form of a pissing contest.

                    Both Canelo and Golovkin are fighting huge underdogs and if they do anything less than completely dismantle them people will stop *****ing like they always do.

                    And if Khan (who's a perfect stylistic match-up for Canelo to shine against btw), will look somehow competitive it won't mean that this fight was better to begin with. It will mean that Canelo is not as good as we thought he was and it will also mean that he's been fighting at his own made up weight class for a reason: he's afraid of what fighters his own size would do to him.
                    This is the absolute truth. We are getting so many garbage fights that we've stooped so low as to compare which opponent sucks more. Just because people get so caught up in their fan hood that they can't call a garbage fight when they see one.

                    Comment

                    • aboutfkntime
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2015
                      • 47366
                      • 1,631
                      • 3,563
                      • 391,308

                      #50
                      Originally posted by spanishboxing
                      GGG resume isn't bad..it just doesn't have a big name..if he fights khan that would be a name ..but it still won't help his resume since Khan is a WW..Canelo doesn't even want to fight some of those guys on 3G resume since he pick Khan a WW. .ppl hear khan name n 4get he's a WW. ..Khanelo is a joke..so is 3G vs wade but wade is a mandatory fight..he don't fight him he gets strip..

                      No, that is bull****.

                      Golovkin's resume' is bad, especially considering the fact that he is a 10 year vet who is blatantly avoiding world-class opposition.

                      Golovkin fanboys cannot compare Hypekin to Hopkins, when Golovkin's 2 best wins are Martin Murray and Pepe Le Pew.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP