Why do Floyd fans says the IV infusion was not illegal?

[Furn]

If it was the Olympics none of this would have happened because it would have been illegal under their protocol , the testing for boxing is Olympic STYLE testing with the emphasis on the word STYLE , that means its similar but not identical .

The Olympics have Olympic Testing , they dont have the word STYLE in any reference to there system .

it was still illegal in this case otherwise why was a TUE needed ?

In any sport with integrity that you cant get a TUE after you've been caught using an banned method. Floyd could and should have been banned for 2-4 years for using a banned metghod without an exemption.

[Rath]

NO the IV was illegal and your a moron if you dont already know that, now a simple question for you. What are you going to do about it?

make a thread, this is a forum you genius.

[Rath]

Rath is Larry alt? Larry your troll game is on point bravo bravo....
[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/ZxrpYTevDLmmY/*****.gif[/IMG]

there he goes again.

a meme man who loves to post gifs LOL

[Rath]

Yes how much more simple answer you want .

same follow up question why the need for TUE if it was legal?

remember team Floyd has not applied for a TUE at this time. it was 19 days later.

[Rath]

Why are ppl still talking about his on here. It was vitamins and saline for rehydtration, not even a big deal lots of athletes do it. Even if it was illegal who gives a **** its just vitamins lmao

oh so now genius floyd fan don't wast to give a ****!

what happened to cleaning up th sport doe?

6 yrs of non stop Pac accusations and now you don't give a ****?

genius floyd fan and his logic

[RussB23]

oh so now genius floyd fan don't wast to give a ****!

what happened to cleaning up th sport doe?

6 yrs of non stop Pac accusations and now you don't give a ****?

genius floyd fan and his logic

It was vitamins not peds , learn to read. Seriously its not that hard to understand unless your a salty *******.

Vitamins and saline = NOT PEDS

[Reloaded]

same follow up question why the need for TUE if it was legal?

remember team Floyd has not applied for a TUE at this time. it was 19 days later.

If its illegal a TUE cannot make it legal it would not be allowed point blank , laws have clauses written for reasons , you need to look deeper than you are as you are swimming around only on the surface in the sea of hate , the truth lay much deeper than your knowledge on the subject allows .

[kilojay505]

make a thread, this is a forum you genius.

there is already over 10 threads with this same exact subject d!p$h!t so your going to make another one 2 yrs after the fight happend!? get a life you loser

[kilojay505]

You are incorrect. The IV was 100% legal under the rules of Nevada.

Manny & Floyd voluntarily agreed to notify USADA of any IV use so USADA could conclude whether the use was legitimate. All protocols were followed and USADA determined the use was legitimate.

Floyd did nothing wrong.

although the iv itself was not illegal the amount of 750ml was.

[Rath]

The IV was 100% legal under the rules of Nevada.

link for this specific rule pls.

if it was, does it say you can IV even if you are nor dehydrated? and the amount of 750 ml is legal limit?

until now nobody in authority has said categorically that floyd was dehydrated, not NSAC, not USADA.



In addition to Nevada's regulations, Manny and Floyd voluntarily agreed to additional regulations. Even though the IV was already 100% legal under the rules of Nevada, Manny and Floyd voluntarily agreed that USADA would be notified of any IV use and that USADA would determine whether the use was legitimate.

As was voluntarily agreed to, USADA was notified of the IV use, USADA investigated whether the use was legitimate and determined that it was.

this is where i think you have to clarify.

Scenario 1. USADA went to Floyd's house for a surprise test (what you call random) caught Floyd doing IV infusion.

Scenario 2. USADA went to Floyd's house to collect sample for testing, Floyd can not provide enough urine for testing and that is when USADA said Floyd was dehydrated and allowed to performed/administer IV infusion.

Scenario 3. Floyd call USADA to inform them that he is dehydrated. USADA came look at Floyd and said yes you are dehydrated you can perform IV infusion.

Remember none of the collecting agent that went to Floyd's house were doctors, or even authorized to say if Floyd was dehydrated or not.

which of the scenarios are you talking about that happened then?

The IV was 100% legal according to Nevada rules and the voluntary agreement between Manny & Floyd outlined specific protocols in the event of IV use and those protocols were followed.

If an IV is used the day before a fight, USADA is going to need time to determine if the use was legitimate. That is why you file for the exemption, as outlined in Manny & Floyd's voluntary agreement, then USADA investigates and eventually makes their determination after investigating the exemption.

Have you heard of an IV use after the fight? and the fighter request for TUE of course not.

The IV will always be administered day or days before the fight.

you file for the TUE before the actual IV infusion or right then and there when you are administering it not 19 days later and 18 days after the fight.

would you accept a free concert ticket given to you 19 days after the concert was finished?

Everything was done 100% within the rules. If it wasn't, Top Rank would have sued for breach of contract.

Was Team Pac or NSAC informed about all of this?

everything was done 100% within the rules you say.

spinning is genius floyd fans trademark you seem to be very good at it.