who among suspected PED user got away the most: Pacquaio, Mayweather or Marquez?

[Zaroku]

They made specific claims of fact. Its up to them to prove it.

Where is the DCO's statement confirming USADA statements of what happened with the IV? Who were the paramedics? What company were they from?

We will never hear from the DCO and I'll tell you why. He probably resigned, and got a nice fat severance check along with a nondisclosure agreement.

Fat checks and NDA's go a long way!

[Lester Tutor]

But Manny had a blister on his toe, and God made him lose!

Post PAC Losing Stress Disorder!

They also suffer from KTFO6 Shock & Denial! Foot stomp!!!

Hahahahahaha!

PAC really hurt his fans with his LGBT statements. I support him and his right to have his religious convictions! He KOed lots of his LGBT fans with one punch!!
WAR PAC!

What's funnier is Dan Rafael doesn't have a point when he stated that Floyd never asked for ''special considerations'' in his 40-0 run but when negotiating a Pac bout in 2010 he complains about Floyd wanting the 3 blood testings (which ESPN educated the public on WADA), yet fat Dan doesn't have a rational opinion just emotion.

In other words if in theory Floyd juiced and Pac juiced, and this is how Floyd knew it would be the only way for a fair fight, then it wouldn't it make more sense not to fight Pac? Or even funnier, Floyd knew with or without the juice he'd still beat Pac? Why would Pac walk away from 40 million.

In other words. Was the juice really important to Pac?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKEQfjowW_Y&t=1m03s

[GTTofAK]

In other words if in theory Floyd juiced and Pac juiced, and this is how Floyd knew it would be the only way for a fair fight, then it wouldn't it make more sense not to fight Pac? Or even funnier, Floyd knew with or without the juice he'd still beat Pac? Why would Pac walk away from 40 million.

Why would Froid have to come off the juice? We already know from Landis testimony to the LA federal prosecutor that USADA will and has tipped of athletes on when the testers are coming.

[Lester Tutor]

Why would Froid have to come off the juice? We already know from Landis testimony to the LA federal prosecutor that USADA will and has tipped of athletes on when the testers are coming.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKEQfjowW_Y&t=1m03s

[GTTofAK]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKEQfjowW_Y&t=1m03s

That doesn't answer the question. Why would Froid have to give up juice? We know from a completely unrelated incident, the US Cycle Team investigation, that USADA has been tipping off athletes.

Its pretty damn easy to not test positive if you know when the tester is coming. Unless of course you are ****** enough to offer the same arm you just got the IV in.

Oh wait.

[Lester Tutor]

That doesn't answer the question. Why would Froid have to give up juice? We know from a completely unrelated incident, the US Cycle Team investigation that USADA has been tipping off athletes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKEQfjowW_Y&t=1m03s

[travestyny]

Controlling authorities are not mandatory. But you have to show some exceptional circumstances in specific cases to break from the controlling authority. You can show none in this case. Under what circumstances would the council be justified in ignoring WADA's review of the literature?

Are you really still going? Do you really want to put more nails in your coffin?

International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions
The World Anti-Doping Code International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE) is a mandatory International Standard developed as part of the World Anti-Doping Program.
https://www.usada.org/wp-content/upl...2015-ISTUE.pdf

So I guess the ISTUE is not a controlling authority at all, according to your logic. Just stop. Furthermore, how can something (like information found on the "Ask the scientists" section of USADA's website) be considered controlling if it is not mandatory??? DO YOU KNOW WHAT MANDATORY MEANS????? YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!

If we go back to your ******ed obsession with the ISTUE form. You argue that because ISTUE does not mention IV's then its anything goes. But if you read it, it only specifically mentions one prohibited substance or method, "steroids" in a comment example. So under your reasoning since ISTUE doesn't' specifically mention EPO, blood doping, clenbutral, diuretics, or any other other numerous of banned substance and methods that aren't steroids then they are all legal.

What the hell are you talking about, moron? It covers ALL prohibited substances and methods. INCLUDING IV's!

I can't express enough how much of an idiot you are. PLEASE STOP WASTING MY TIME WITH YOUR IDIOTIC DRIVEL. Go debate with 5 year olds. They can read at a higher level than you can!

And go add MANDATORY to your spelling list. Get on that homework, son.

[GTTofAK]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKEQfjowW_Y&t=1m03s

You can keep linking it because you are too ****** to make your own argument but its not relevant.

[Lester Tutor]

You can keep linking it because you are too ****** to make your own argument but its not relevant.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKEQfjowW_Y&t=1m03s

[GTTofAK]

What the hell are you talking about, moron? It covers ALL prohibited substances and methods. INCLUDING IV's!

I'm expanding your analsysis moron. This is your arguemnt

WHERE DOES IT SAY THAT IV REHYDRATION IS NEVER TO BE ALLOWED BECAUSE DRINKING WATER IS ADEQUATE???? I've pointed to explicit wording in the ISTUE that reveals that the athlete and his/her medical practitioner can justify using the IV. WHERE IS YOUR EXPLICIT LANGUAGE PROHIBITING IV REHYDRATION IN ALL CIRCUMSTANCES?

Your are arguing that because ISTUE does not specifically address IV re-hydration then it is legal. But ISTUE doesn't specifically address any prohibited substances or methods other than a general example of "steroids" being found in someones home.

Under your reasoning EPO, blood doping, clen, diuretics, all legal because ISTUE doesn't specifically address them.

ISTUE says that if you want specifics go to the Medical section which you chose to ignore because its not "mandatory". Like that somehow gives carte blache to totally ignore it.