Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How is a guy who has one 12 round fight & one 10 round fight worthy of a fight w AW?
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by Kagami Taiga View PostEven if I give you Bwterbiev, beating former far dininished champions. Gonzalez is Shabranssky''s only good win. Wtf has Gonzalez done that puts him above Murat? Those wins are easily identical in every single way. Seriously. And no mention of Chilemba, I don't know why you would even act like that's a better fight. Or Brahemer, a fight that is probably the worse of the pack. Seriously, guy. You want to act like Barrera and Wade are comparable. I can't help you. I suggest you do yourself a favor and watch both guys fight and see how comparable they look.
Ask the boxing fans, would we rather see Ward fight Yunieski Gonzalez or Karo Murat?
Comment
-
Originally posted by SplitSecond View PostOk, in the very same page from one of the quotes you say
So you were just trolling then? Just odd because I remember you adamantaly arguing the case in alot of threads, anyway, I guess we can drop it.
His hardcore fans are OK with him staying at MW, being patient and eventually collecting all of the belts. They assume that all these guys will fight him and not wait until he shows signs of decline.
My stance is, he's wasting his prime so he should move up and seek challenges because if you give up advantages, fighters will be more willing to step in the ring.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SplitSecond View PostArguably beating Pascal surely? Murat has done nothing to show he's as good as Gonzalez.
Ask the boxing fans, would we rather see Ward fight Yunieski Gonzalez or Karo Murat?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by techliam View PostPeople refer to sanctioning body ranks when it seems convenient for them. In reality however, they reflect nothing of any interest. Their ranking systems are one of the mysteries of the universe.
He may be ranked by ESPN, Wade is ranked by TBRB.
His sole win over a faded (limited) Murat clearly doesn't beat the resumes of Stevenson, Kovalev, Pascal, Hopkins, Shabranskyy, Braehmer (thats saying something), Fonfara, Alvarez, Beterbiev or Chilemba. Then you have fighters like Gonzales with his spirited effort against Pascal, which is far more than a win over a virtual nobody in Murat, Browne with a somewhat comparable win over Campilllo, who was at least a former titleholder, Oosthuizen with a fairly limited run at 175 picking up a minor title. All fighters with strong cases to be ranked higher than him. So your claim he has a comparable resume to half the top 10 light heavy is pretty absurd.
So whats your argument. He's better because he's cuban and ESPN ranked him? That's pretty much a clear case of grasping at straws from the vacuum you so gallantly described. Both matches, Wade and Barrera, are as bad as each other. So why fanboys are whining at each other from both sides, is way beyond me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SplitSecond View PostShot to sht my ass, and Pascal is obviously better than Campillo, the *** is the matter with you?
Comment
-
Originally posted by techliam View PostPeople refer to sanctioning body ranks when it seems convenient for them. In reality however, they reflect nothing of any interest. Their ranking systems are one of the mysteries of the universe.
He may be ranked by ESPN, Wade is ranked by TBRB.
His sole win over a faded (limited) Murat clearly doesn't beat the resumes of Stevenson, Kovalev, Pascal, Hopkins, Shabranskyy, Braehmer (thats saying something), Fonfara, Alvarez, Beterbiev or Chilemba. Then you have fighters like Gonzales with his spirited effort against Pascal, which is far more than a win over a virtual nobody in Murat, Browne with a somewhat comparable win over Campilllo, who was at least a former titleholder, Oosthuizen with a fairly limited run at 175 picking up a minor title. All fighters with strong cases to be ranked higher than him. So your claim he has a comparable resume to half the top 10 light heavy is pretty absurd.
So whats your argument. He's better because he's cuban and ESPN ranked him? That's pretty much a clear case of grasping at straws from the vacuum you so gallantly described. Both matches, Wade and Barrera, are as bad as each other. So why fanboys are whining at each other from both sides, is way beyond me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kagami Taiga View PostPascal is clearly shot, and not once did i argue he wasnt better than Campillo. Doesnt change the fact that Pascal hasn't really looked good in ages and he looked downright horrible in his last two fights. And Gonzalez still didnt pull off that win. Its like splitting hairs with you guys but stop being ridiculous. Gonzalez is a decent win. Murat is a decent win. Both net you about the same. AND both Barrera and Shabranskky destroyed those guys.
As for Pascal not having looked good in ages, he's never really looked good, even in his best win against Dawson he was fading badly and getting hammered in the final rounds. Just stop.
Comment
Comment