Khan is irrelevant

[FrankieBruno]

if he were irrelevant you wouldn't have made a thread about him

you ****** divo

there are a lot of butt hurt people, who can't seem to hide their emotions...

first it was khan is avoiding punchers

now that khan is facing a huge puncher, these same people still moan and *****

[Invictas]

if he were irrelevant you wouldn't have made a thread about him

you ****** divo

there are a lot of butt hurt people, who can't seem to hide their emotions...

first it was khan is avoiding punchers

now that khan is facing a huge puncher, these same people still moan and *****

Reminded me of the Following story.

Dale Carnegie wrote over sixty years ago that no,one ever kicks a dead Dog.

No One Ever Kicks a Dead Dog

By John Torre

When you are kicked and criticized, remember that is often done because it gives the kicker a feeling of importance. It often means that you are accomplishing something and are worthy of attention. Many people get a sense of savage satisfaction out of denouncing those who are better educated than they are or more successful.

For example, Dale Carnegie used to cite the case of Admiral Peary, the explorer who startled and thrilled the world by reaching the North Pole with dog sleds on April 6, 1909—a goal that brave men for centuries had suffered and starved and died to attain. Peary himself almost died from cold and starvation; and eight of his toes were frozen so hard they had to be cut off. He was so overwhelmed with disasters that he feared he would go insane.
His superior naval officers in Washington were burned up because Peary was getting so much publicity and acclaim. So they accused him of collecting money for scientific expeditions and then “lying around and loafing in the Arctic.” Their determination to humiliate and block Peary was so violent that only a direct order from President McKinley enabled Peary to continue his career in the Arctic.

Would Peary have been denounced if he had had a desk job in the Navy Department in Washington? No. He wouldn’t have been important enough then to have aroused jealousy.
Remember—if you are tempted to be worried about unjust criticism, it’s often just a disguised compliment. No one ever kicks a dead dog.

- See more at: http://dalecarnegiewayohio.com/2013/....mnjMWm0p.dpuf

[Roy Jones Jnr]

A wise man once said ''haters are gonna hate, as they say in America''.

[Zaroku]

Khan will always be relevant. Its easier to just accept it, less painful for you.

From the moment he became the youngest olympic medalist since Floyd Patterson he was always going to be big. His rematch with Kindelan was one of the most watched sporting events of 2005. He has done a lot as a pro also:

Kotelnik, Malignaggi, Maidana, Judah, Collazo, Alexander, Algieri is a bunch of very good wins. A lot more than a lot of fighters who are thought of more highly.

Not to mention he is pretty exciting to watch most of the time, his fight with Maidana was a war.

He is going to be relevant until he retires.

Agreed. Plus he has the ****** world behind him. I like it that he is fighting Canelo. I was shocked when it was announced.

WAR Khan!

[STREET CLEANER]

-Beats Canelo he becomes #P4P 1 in star power rankings, and #P4P Top 3 Globally.
-Loses to Canelo, he then walks straight into mandatory title shot versus the winner of Garcia v Peterson/Berto.
-Beats Garcia, he cements his position as P4P Top 10
-Loses to Garcia, he gets the larger purse versus Kell Brook, which Sky will be able to hype up in a matter of weeks.

If you think this is irrelevant, then you are the thickest poster on this forum!

The WBC removed him from the #1 WW contender. If he loses and looks like **** he is getting no shot at anything, maybe Brook with what ever they offer him

[STREET CLEANER]

if he were irrelevant you wouldn't have made a thread about him

you ****** divo

there are a lot of butt hurt people, who can't seem to hide their emotions...

first it was khan is avoiding punchers

now that khan is facing a huge puncher, these same people still moan and *****

Sensitive aren't you. Never said that he is not facing a puncher, he is way above his head in this fight. A good big fighter always beat a good smaller fighter

[STREET CLEANER]

Khan will always be relevant. Its easier to just accept it, less painful for you.

From the moment he became the youngest olympic medalist since Floyd Patterson he was always going to be big. His rematch with Kindelan was one of the most watched sporting events of 2005. He has done a lot as a pro also:

Kotelnik, Malignaggi, Maidana, Judah, Collazo, Alexander, Algieri is a bunch of very good wins. A lot more than a lot of fighters who are thought of more highly.

Not to mention he is pretty exciting to watch most of the time, his fight with Maidana was a war.

He is going to be relevant until he retires.

He has good wins but nothing outstanding. Plus he cannot sustain a good streak

[STREET CLEANER]

Agreed. Plus he has the ****** world behind him. I like it that he is fighting Canelo. I was shocked when it was announced.

WAR Khan!

No doubt that this is a fight between two popular fighters but it doesn't define anything in boxing.

This is no different than Vinny Pazienza vs Rober Duran fight, popular but meaningless

[GoldenGloveLove]

I think what you mean to say is YOU BELIEVE HE DESERVES TO BE FAR LESS RELEVANT than he obviously is, for better or worse.

[STREET CLEANER]

I think what you mean to say is YOU BELIEVE HE DESERVES TO BE FAR LESS RELEVANT than he obviously is, for better or worse.

I'm not discussing his popularity. What has he done lately that would make him competitive let alone the favorite in this fight?

He did not face not even one top WW.