Has the GGG Hate gone too far?

[Publius]

Thread is still alive I see. Looks like it touched a nerve with GGG haters. Here's something to consider:

Many of you say that GGG benefits from double standards, but I'd challenge you to consider that he may in fact suffer from double standards as well. For instance, many of you seem to believe that he has no right to negotiate terms to his benefit and that any such negotiation constitutes ducking - no matter what. This doesn't really apply to any other fighter.

[The Big Dunn]

Just exposing your double standards clown. You and others will portray Hopkins as an all time great, and his best wins at 160, are over two blown up welterweights. Hopkins fought Echols and Allen 5 times. Nobody ever questions how great Bernard was at 160, but this new dude comes along, knocking mofos out left and right, stringing up a KO streak that is unheard of in this era while closing in on the record for middleweight defenses, and you lames want to scream and shout, "HE HASN'T FOUGHT ANYONE". Yet, at the same time, you can't name one champion at 160 who he has turned down to fight. Your mouths become zipped shut when it comes time to talk about how every middleweight titlist has flat out refused to fight GGG. So again, tell me, who did Hopkins beat at 160 that places him among the best middleweights of all time?

The difference is Hopkins won his MW title in the ring. GGG was given the title after beating an absolute bum.

What's really odd is you are one of the people that always used to argue that Bhop had a great resume and was ahead of a guy like Floyd. Now, you are questioning the same resume you touted.

How did BHop's resume get so bad all of the sudden?

[joseph5620]

Beating a blown up welterweight at middleweight is not really a big deal. But by your logic, if GGG beat a blown up welterweight, he becomes an all time great! So which welterweight does he need to beat?

Calling Trinidad a "blown up welterweight" is ridiculously ******. Or maybe that's just another part of your agenda.

[-PBP-]

Calling Trinidad a "blown up welterweight" is ridiculously ******. Or maybe that's just another part of your agenda.

And to think these were the same guys criticizing Cotto for not fighting GGG. Further reason to stop taking this site seriously.

[sicko]

Just exposing your double standards clown. You and others will portray Hopkins as an all time great, and his best wins at 160, are over two blown up welterweights. Hopkins fought Echols and Allen 5 times. Nobody ever questions how great Bernard was at 160, but this new dude comes along, knocking mofos out left and right, stringing up a KO streak that is unheard of in this era while closing in on the record for middleweight defenses, and you lames want to scream and shout, "HE HASN'T FOUGHT ANYONE". Yet, at the same time, you can't name one champion at 160 who he has turned down to fight. Your mouths become zipped shut when it comes time to talk about how every middleweight titlist has flat out refused to fight GGG. So again, tell me, who did Hopkins beat at 160 that places him among the best middleweights of all time?

Please find me a Post in which I ever Portrayed B-Hop as the Greatest Middleweight Ever

You just made up a bunch of BS to deflect which is very common on this forum. You talk about one fighter and then some CLOWN come and drag other fighters. I have NEVER claimed that B-Hop was anything closed to being the greatest Middleweight especially when Marvin Hagler is my favorite fighter of All Time



Cong****, you Made an ASS out of yourself by ASSuming

[b00g13man]

Calling Trinidad a "blown up welterweight" is ridiculously ******. Or maybe that's just another part of your agenda.

It's not an agenda. He is that ******.