Comments Thread For: Team Golovkin Explore UK Bout: DeGale, Lee, Saunders, Eubank

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • soul_survivor
    LOL @ Ali-Holmes
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jun 2013
    • 18949
    • 623
    • 473
    • 65,236

    #51
    Originally posted by Irony123
    personal preference out of the four.

    1) Degale for supremacy
    2) BJS for unified (if GGG beats canelo)
    3) Lee or Eubank... either one i don't care
    I agree with that order, considering DeGale is probably one of the top 2 smw and BJS is a title holder and then Lee and Eubank seem to be legit contenders, especially Lee.

    Can throw Jacobs in there with Lee and Eubank and GGG should be having 2 of these fights at least this year.

    Comment

    • Jsmooth9876
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2014
      • 12209
      • 2,297
      • 365
      • 72,745

      #52
      Originally posted by Chollo Vista
      According to Loeffler, Daniel Jacobs is bigger and matches up better against GGG than Canelo.

      Just sayin
      And??? If Jacobs had a real title and not the JV version of what GGG already has he'd be on the hit list as well...

      Lara brings nothing to the table except being a guy who almost won a few big fights lol.

      Comment

      • Chollo Vista
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Nov 2012
        • 10801
        • 1,428
        • 1,024
        • 154,684

        #53
        Originally posted by Jsmooth9876
        And??? If Jacobs had a real title and not the JV version of what GGG already has he'd be on the hit list as well...
        Unfortunately, when it's all said and done, history will look at WHO you beat and their level of threat at the time, not "da belts doe".

        These aren't my rules, but boxing.

        If you're a true fan of GGG, you'd set him up for success to go down in history as one of the greats. Not advocate "da belts doe" school of thought. It will hurt him in the long run.

        Jus sayin

        Comment

        • aboutfkntime
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2015
          • 47366
          • 1,631
          • 3,563
          • 391,308

          #54
          Originally posted by Jsmooth9876
          And??? If Jacobs had a real title and not the JV version of what GGG already has he'd be on the hit list as well...

          Lara brings nothing to the table except being a guy who almost won a few big fights lol.

          You just described Martin Murray..... who is Golovkin's best win

          Comment

          • Jsmooth9876
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2014
            • 12209
            • 2,297
            • 365
            • 72,745

            #55
            Originally posted by Chollo Vista
            Unfortunately, when it's all said and done, history will look at WHO you beat and their level of threat at the time, not "da belts doe".

            These aren't my rules, but boxing.

            If you're a true fan of GGG, you'd set him up for success to go down in history as one of the greats. Not advocate "da belts doe" school of thought. It will hurt him in the long run.

            Jus sayin
            How exactly would "I" set him up for success? Lol, as if any of us have a say in who he fights or who will fight him.. It's a business... Do I want to see him vs the likes of Canelo,Degale,Lara,Jacobs? Of course.....who wouldn't?

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP