You have your opinions, I have mine. You're a smart guy, I'm no slouch. No need for name calling.
Everybody thinks Golovkin is high risk/low reward right now, but they also think he's been fighting 'bums' and is thus unproven. Beating the #1 man in SMW would remove the 'unproven' tag, thus shifting his ratio into 'ultra high risk / still low reward'.
BJ will laugh at the offer and tell you 'I said I needed 18 months when he was an unproven MW. Ask me when he's 40'
And Canelo will say 'Sorry, he's a 168 now, I fight at 155. Too much weight difference'.
But like I said, we had this argument before. I'm done.
Everybody thinks Golovkin is high risk/low reward right now, but they also think he's been fighting 'bums' and is thus unproven. Beating the #1 man in SMW would remove the 'unproven' tag, thus shifting his ratio into 'ultra high risk / still low reward'.
BJ will laugh at the offer and tell you 'I said I needed 18 months when he was an unproven MW. Ask me when he's 40'
And Canelo will say 'Sorry, he's a 168 now, I fight at 155. Too much weight difference'.
But like I said, we had this argument before. I'm done.
Comment