Do you believe Compubox is accurate?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NaijaD
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2011
    • 3444
    • 204
    • 215
    • 30,256

    #51
    Originally posted by _Maxi
    You think it's low? you think it's impossible? then just watch the fucking video and see for yourself how inaccurate it was and how Pacquiao outlanded Mayweather.
    I have seen those videos that spoon posted and you expect me to go with an edited slow motion video by a Pacquaio fan over watching the actual fight, your daily mail article claims compubox credited Floyd with 80 punches that he never landed. Why is there not a bigger investigation into this??..... why didn't any of the reputable boxing sites post this or does Floyd own them all, I thought he only owned fighthype?

    I'm done with this, my apologies for calling your post low... maybe I can't see what you're seeing, doesn't seem like many can. The majority aren't always right so I'll give you that in regards to your su****ions.

    Comment

    • Real King Kong
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2010
      • 12017
      • 454
      • 24
      • 105,905

      #52
      I'm not saying that compubox is accurate and I'm not even saying slowmo doesn't have it's merit...but seriously, has there ever been a fan base who's refused to let go of a situation like this. I mean bradley was given a much more questionable decision and pac fans moved past that. Is it because the majority of people agreed that pac should have won that fight? It's ok for your guy to lose a close fight...just because floyd is the villain here, doesn't mean it's necessary to have a never ending crusade to sway people's opinion.

      Comment

      • _Maxi
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2015
        • 8977
        • 508
        • 718
        • 91,740

        #53
        Originally posted by NaijaD
        I have seen those videos that spoon posted and you expect me to go with an edited slow motion video by a Pacquaio fan over watching the actual fight, your daily mail article claims compubox credited Floyd with 80 punches that he never landed. Why is there not a bigger investigation into this??..... why didn't any of the reputable boxing sites post this or does Floyd own them all, I thought he only owned fighthype?

        I'm done with this, my apologies for calling your post low... maybe I can't see what you're seeing, doesn't seem like many can. The majority aren't always right so I'll give you that in regards to your su****ions.
        Then just download and watch the fight for yourself. You can put it in slow motion in any video player. Make your own punch count.

        Then you'll see it. You are actually believing in compubox which is not good man, but it's ok.

        Comment

        • The Akbar One
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2007
          • 1151
          • 61
          • 75
          • 10,010

          #54
          Originally posted by _Maxi
          I'm just making this poll to find out how credible Compubox is to you. Please vote.
          Numerous post fight video analyses, show CompuBox to be totally inaccurate.

          Comment

          • The Akbar One
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2007
            • 1151
            • 61
            • 75
            • 10,010

            #55
            Originally posted by considerthis
            I mean bradley was given a much more questionable decision and pac fans moved past that.
            Video Analysis of that fight actually doesn't support a robbery.

            Comment

            • NaijaD
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jan 2011
              • 3444
              • 204
              • 215
              • 30,256

              #56
              Originally posted by _Maxi
              Then just download and watch the fight for yourself. You can put it in slow motion in any video player. Make your own punch count.

              Then you'll see it. You are actually believing in compubox which is not good man, but it's ok.
              I don't think it's 100% accurate, I just don't believe it's as wildly inaccurate as you say it is, for instance I found it hard to believe when shobox said Wilder landed more punches than Spzilka, in fact I don't believe he did at least not from what I saw. I didn't believe it when they said Pacquaio out landed Marquez in the third fight either. But majority of the time I believe it is right and May-Pac was one of the times I thought it was right.

              Comment

              • The Akbar One
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2007
                • 1151
                • 61
                • 75
                • 10,010

                #57
                Compu Box is atrocious. One of the more comical ones was from Forrest vs Mayorga II. Lampley stated that through four rounds CompuBox had Mayorga landing 40 power punches. Did Mayorga even land 15 clean shots period through four rounds?

                Comment

                • meme_man
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2014
                  • 1665
                  • 184
                  • 191
                  • 17,691

                  #58
                  Originally posted by b00g13man


                  #FloydRuinsLives
                  It's crazy may 2nd is the past. I never seen nothing like this before.

                  Comment

                  • LA_2_Vegas
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 7286
                    • 594
                    • 1,211
                    • 33,333

                    #59
                    All these years watching fights and I really have no idea how these companies even define a landed punch. I'm sure there is a guideline, and that the Compubox folks are trained in the practice, but it seems to me that introducing another human into the equation just makes it as subjective as judging.

                    The stats just show up on the screen and we're supposed to take them at face value.

                    I never really think that there is anything malicious going on - it's just a system that has an inherent margin for error which should always be kept in mind.

                    I pay no attention to them whatsoever as a fight is happening, and it plays no role into how I score a round/fight.

                    I only find them halfway useful when looking for general trends in output for a certain fighter.


                    (as far as the fight in question....I am with Pac fans who think he landed the better punches in the fight, and that it was more competitive than many lead on..... but it's still 116-112 Floyd. Easy fight to score)


                    also, Daggum's Compuclinch>Compubox
                    Last edited by LA_2_Vegas; 01-25-2016, 06:19 PM.

                    Comment

                    • MotorCityJaguar
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Jul 2011
                      • 198
                      • 5
                      • 1
                      • 9,950

                      #60
                      Talking about punches thrown yes Compubox in accurate, it's easy to see a punch thrown. On the contrary see a punch hit the target is not easy in many occasions. Thus as it regards the punches landed Compubox is not accurate


                      Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP