Do you believe Compubox is accurate?

[Real King Kong]

When it's so corrupt as it happened in the Mayweather-Pacquiao or in the Mayweather-Cotto fight, what would you expect? I don't want any of those biased corrupt "stats".

Fair enough if you don't want compubox...but unfortunately you don't run hbo, so you'll just have to ignore it. Saying it's inaccurate is one thing, but saying corrupt and biased is just self serving. You would not be saying that if the punch stats ended up in pacs favor. I mean, if people had to watch in slowmo to see all these "landed punches", then how do you expect someone watching in real time from rungside is going to catch them all?

[_Maxi]

Fair enough if you don't want compubox...but unfortunately you don't run hbo, so you'll just have to ignore it. Saying it's inaccurate is one thing, but saying corrupt and biased is just self serving. You would not be saying that if the punch stats ended up in pacs favor. I mean, if people had to watch in slowmo to see all these "landed punches", then how do you expect someone watching in real time from rungside is going to catch them all?

There's proof of Compubox being inaccurate in a non-understandable way in some rounds between Mayweather and Cotto. For example in some rounds Cotto landed 9 clear shots but Compubox only saw 3. Similar things happened in the Mayweather Pacquiao fight, where in some rounds Floyd had landed 5 punches and Compubox noticed 15.

That's not human error, that's something else.

If you really want to have a serious conversation, there's video proof that I can search for you on youtube. If you're just going to ignore it and have a laugh, then I won't lose my time.

[b00g13man]

And you still didn't present your arguments. You just pretend to be smart. Can you list all your reasons why "floyd win fights"?. Of course he won a lot of fights. But particulary why he beat Pacquiao. And another question? Did Floyd outland Pacquiao?

Floyd outclassed Pacquiao based on pretty much all the scoring criteria; clean punching, ring generalship, defence, not because of "compubox". Anyone with a brain cell can see that. It's obvious you don't have one to boast of though.

[_Maxi]

Floyd outclassed Pacquiao based on pretty much all the scoring criteria; clean punching, ring generalship, defence, not because of "compubox". Anyone with a brain cell can see that. It's obvious you don't have one to boast of though.

So to you Floyd outlanded Pacquiao. And he dodged the most punches.

Did you ever watch the fight in slow motion and counted the punches for yourself?

[b00g13man]

So to you Floyd outlanded Pacquiao. And he dodged the most punches.

Did you ever watch the fight in slow motion and counted the punches for yourself?

Slow motion. GTFO with that bull****.

[Dr Rumack]

Slow motion. GTFO with that bull****.

Why is slow motion bullshit?

[b00g13man]

Why is slow motion bullshit?

Fights are scored in real time, and no biased, edited slow motion video is going to change that.

[Real King Kong]

There's proof of Compubox being inaccurate in a non-understandable way in some rounds between Mayweather and Cotto. For example in some rounds Cotto landed 9 clear shots but Compubox only saw 3. Similar things happened in the Mayweather Pacquiao fight, where in some rounds Floyd had landed 5 punches and Compubox noticed 15.

That's not human error, that's something else.

If you really want to have a serious conversation, there's video proof that I can search for you on youtube. If you're just going to ignore it and have a laugh, then I won't lose my time.

Interesting...but no need to spend the time. I thought floyd won both of those fights, and it wasn't becuse of compubox.

[_Maxi]

Why is slow motion bullshit?

Unbeliveable isn't it? you have a tool to verify who actually outlanded who, but that tool is dismissed and the "human eye" while watching the fight live with biased commentary is great.

They don't like slow motion because it shows that Pacquiao landed more than Mayweather.

[Dr Rumack]

Fights are scored in real time, and no biased, edited slow motion video is going to change that.

Slow motion is slow motion. If you want to test the accuracy of a system that claims to count landed punches, then slowing down exchanges is the best way to do it. I don't see how anything that gives you a truer picture of events is bad.