Do you believe Compubox is accurate?

[b00g13man]

Slow motion is slow motion. If you want to test the accuracy of a system that claims to count landed punches, then slowing down exchanges is the best way to do it. I don't see how anything that gives you a truer picture of events is bad.

That post wasn't about testing compubox.

[Marchegiano]

How accurate do you think a group of BS posters would be if they counted punches and averaged their numbers against each other?

Exactly, it's plenty accurate. Quit stealing your thoughts from social media.

[daggum]

its 100 percent accurate. don't question compubox. don't' question anything in fact

[Dr Rumack]

its 100 percent accurate. don't question compubox. don't' question anything in fact

[_Maxi]

Slow motion is slow motion. If you want to test the accuracy of a system that claims to count landed punches, then slowing down exchanges is the best way to do it. I don't see how anything that gives you a truer picture of events is bad.

Real stats:

Mayweather - landed 68 out of 471 (14.4% accuracy)
Pacquiao - landed 98 out of 414 (23,5% accuracy)

Not only Pacquiao outlanded him, but also defended better.

There's a good article in the Dailymail that explains the whole situation. Any fair analysis made to the replay of the fight showed that Pacquiao outlanded Floyd clearly.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing/article-3077424/The-punch-statistics-prove-Floyd-Mayweather-fortunate-beat-Manny-Pacquiao-unanimous-decision.html

[anonymous2.0]

I don't see a reason why it can't be accurate. Why don't they have 3 guys mashing buttons and then compare notes after the fight and take the average? Or why not do a review using replays after the fight?

[lefthook2daliva]

I'm quite sure it's more accurate than the great majority of the people who post here.

And wtf does a retired fighter have to do with it?

[NaijaD]

Real stats:

Mayweather - landed 68 out of 471 (14.4% accuracy)
Pacquiao - landed 98 out of 414 (23,5% accuracy)

Not only Pacquiao outlanded him, but also defended better.

There's a good article in the Dailymail that explains the whole situation. Any fair analysis made to the replay of the fight showed that Pacquiao outlanded Floyd clearly.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/box...-decision.html

This is pretty low man, if compubox was THIS inaccurate in the biggest ever boxing event then surely surely surellllyyyyy there would have been a lot more than just one article on the daily mail of all places loooool.

This is low, I don't know how you thought you were making sense when you typed out that farcical post. You just love conspiracy theories it seems.

[_Maxi]

This is pretty low man, if compubox was THIS inaccurate in the biggest ever boxing event then surely surely surellllyyyyy there would have been a lot more than just one article on the daily mail of all places loooool.

This is low, I don't know how you thought you were making sense when you typed out that farcical post. You just love conspiracy theories it seems.

You think it's low? you think it's impossible? then just watch the fucking video and see for yourself how inaccurate it was and how Pacquiao outlanded Mayweather.

[b00g13man]

You think it's low? you think it's impossible? then just watch the fucking video and see for yourself how inaccurate it was and how Pacquiao outlanded Mayweather.

#FloydRuinsLives