Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Do you believe Compubox is accurate?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    I have made several test where Compubox is very accurate( they miss 1 or two punches here and there), but its just for average fights, better fights are way to wide (they count some and others don't)

    So for me Compubox is a good way to measure most of the fights, but in big fights I just don't use it as a measure stick.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by xhiddenx87 View Post
      I have made several test where Compubox is very accurate( they miss 1 or two punches here and there), but its just for average fights, better fights are way to wide (they count some and others don't)

      So for me Compubox is a good way to measure most of the fights, but in big fights I just don't use it as a measure stick.
      So you're basically saying that it's corrupt and in big fights it plays a roll in favour of the one who puts the money.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
        So you're basically saying that it's corrupt and in big fights it plays a roll in favour of the one who puts the money.
        Compubox isn't used in judging fights, so.....

        You also need to get Floyd's nuts out of your mouth.

        Comment


        • #14
          I don't it is accurate but Is the best we have for punch stats. I didn't vote because the poll was not about compubox.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
            Compubox isn't used in judging fights, so.....

            You also need to get Floyd's nuts out of your mouth.
            Incorrect. A lot of fans use it to determine who outlanded who.

            Why don't you vote? are you scared? use the poll my friend.

            Comment


            • #16
              No but at least it doesn't impact the fight, the judges don't see it so its really just for fans to argue about.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
                Incorrect. A lot of fans use it to determine who outlanded who.

                Why don't you vote? are you scared? use the poll my friend.
                Wrong. People actually watch rounds and score them accordingly.

                I'd vote if the options available weren't drivel from a sad, pathetic mind.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by THE REED™
                  It's as accurate as a human being trying to count punches.
                  Exactly...what more do people want during the fight?

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by considerthis View Post
                    Exactly...what more do people want during the fight?
                    They don't want wildly inaccurate 'stats' at all. Why is that confusing?

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Dr Rumack View Post
                      No, not at all. What they claim to do is impossible in real time. If the accuracy stats were computed after the fight, with the possibility to slow down and replay exchanges, then it might work. But during the fight there's no way you can identify and track landed shots reliably.
                      exactly boxing is a fast paced sport the human eye cant catch every punch thrown and landed but what better option is there

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP