Worst Boxing Org/Sanctioning Body of 2015?

[aboutfkntime]

Had Fury won without a rematch clause, he would have made a lot more for the rematch.

Had Fury won without a rematch clause, he would have been able to keep the IBF title if he wanted to.

You claim Klitschko would have refused to face Fury without a rematch clause.

Which means that if Fury had insisted on enforcing his mandatory position without a rematch clause, Klitschko would have had to vacate two of his titles.

I don't think anybody here but you believes he would have been willing to do that.

Which means you are 100% wrong when you insist Fury wouldn't have gotten a title shot without a rematch clause.

Fury was a DOUBLE MANDATORY. You can't force a mandatory to sign a rematch clause. Klitschko's choice would have been face Fury or vacate.

My position has stayed exactly the same. You accuse me of flip flopping because you don't know how to read.

Yes I still work in the industry. I'm sorry that when rules and laws are explained to you that you prefer to pretend they don't exist.

Rules doe. Kid.

Why are you lying kid ?

The WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch.

Do you still tell people that you work in the boxing industry ?

[aboutfkntime]

I just noticed something.....

The WBA won the poll, Worst Boxing Org/Sanctioning Body of 2015?

A LOT of posters who made that selection, are hardcore Golovkin fans.

So, you Golovkin fans think that the Worst Boxing Org/Sanctioning Body of 2015 is the WBA, because they have far too many champions, what with their super/regular/interim/etc.....

The WBA have far too many bull**** titles, and bull**** champions.

Right ?

Because..... Golovkin only became the real WBA champion when he beat Daniel Geale in July 2014..... until then, Golovkin was one of the bull**** WBA champions mentioned above..... RIGHT ?

He has since defended that title on 4 occasions.

Which is not the 21 that he will need to beat Hopkins record..... RIGHT ?

I will remind you all of your selection again.....
The WBA have far too many bull**** titles, and bull**** champions.

This post..... it may not be gold today, but it sure fkn will be real soon



BOOKMARKED !!

Come on guys, you can't have it both ways..... you can't criticize the WBA for their bull**** today, and then support them tomorrow just because it suits your guy.

[aboutfkntime]

And the winner is.....

This is the official award presentation to the WBA !

They were not my pick, but they are a clear winner !





Congratulations to the WBA !

[aboutfkntime]

post your personal award presentations to the WBA here.....





well done guys !

[original zero]

The WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch.

You're claiming that the WBA & WBO would have allowed Klitschko to FORCE a rematch clause upon Fury?!?

[aboutfkntime]

You're claiming that the WBA & WBO would have allowed Klitschko to FORCE a rematch clause upon Fury?!?

I am claiming that you are an asshat.

A loud, proud, one

[original zero]

I am claiming that you are an asshat.

A loud, proud, one

when you refuse to answer a question that obliterates your position and resume the name calling . . . who do you think you're fooling exactly?

you claimed klitschko wouldn't have faced fury without a rematch clause.

you claimed klitschko wouldn't have vacated his titles if fury refused a rematch clause.

those two things can't both be true.

you refuse to explain yourself because you know that you're trapped.

no amount of name calling changes any of that.

checkmate.

[Boxing@2016]

IBF is an extra organization in my view

[aboutfkntime]

when you refuse to answer a question that obliterates your position and resume the name calling . . . who do you think you're fooling exactly?

you claimed klitschko wouldn't have faced fury without a rematch clause.

you claimed klitschko wouldn't have vacated his titles if fury refused a rematch clause.

those two things can't both be true.

you refuse to explain yourself because you know that you're trapped.

no amount of name calling changes any of that.

checkmate.

Foolio.....

I have answered your question at least A DOZEN TIMES, you lying dishonest clown.

But you have ignored my reply and refused to acknowledge it, at least A DOZEN TIMES, you lying dishonest clown.

Here, I will answer that question again, you lying dishonest clown.....

The WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch.

And speaking of lying dishonest clowns..... do you still run around stating that you work within the boxing industry to try and impress people ?

[aboutfkntime]

silly alt clown.....

rules doe, you are kafkod, aren't you ?