Worst Boxing Org/Sanctioning Body of 2015?

[LoadedWraps]

Stop lying kid..... the WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch.

They have both ignored their mandatory position plenty of times.

And you are not a boxing insider, I don't believe that for 1 second

Stop lying kid !!

It depends on the context, if it makes sense to ignore a mandatory it should be done, and in this sense it did.

[original zero]

It depends on the context, if it makes sense to ignore a mandatory it should be done, and in this sense it did.

You're completely missing what he's saying. He's claiming:

#1 - Tyson Fury would not have received a title shot without a rematch clause despite being WBA & WBO mandatory.

#2 - Wladimir Klitschko would not have vacated his WbA & WBO titles to avoid facing fury.

Those things can't both be true. They're a direct contradiction.

[aboutfkntime]

You're completely missing what he's saying. He's claiming:

#1 - Tyson Fury would not have received a title shot without a rematch clause despite being WBA & WBO mandatory.

#2 - Wladimir Klitschko would not have vacated his WbA & WBO titles to avoid facing fury.

Those things can't both be true. They're a direct contradiction.

Bull**** kid !!

1) stop lying

2) stop putting words into Klitschko's mouth

3) stop putting words into my mouth, you dishonest clown

#1 - Tyson Fury would not have received a title shot without a rematch clause despite being WBA & WBO mandatory.

#1 That is EXACTLY what I am saying, Klitschko would not have fought Fury without a rematch clause. K2 are way too smart for that, and they are way smarter than you.

#2 - Wladimir Klitschko would not have vacated his WbA & WBO titles to avoid facing fury.

#2 Klitschko would NOT have vacated his belts, because the WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch. And they would have allowed the rematch for the following reasons.....

1) Because Fury beating Klitschko completely changed the boxing landscape at heavyweight

2) Because Klitschko was the long-standing champion, and clearly the man at heavyweight..... so he deserves his right to a rematch, and he certainly deserves more respect than you have given him kid

3) Because Fury/Klit II is the #1 fighting the #2, so stop being absurd

4) Because Fury/Klitschko II will erase any/all doubts enabling BOTH organisations to adjust their rankings accordingly, and to assist them with mandatory's/eliminators, looking toward the future

5) Because it is clearly in the best interests of the sport, and of the fans

6) Because they are more intelligent than the IBF, and they are way more intelligent than some dumb kid on the internet

[original zero]

You claim Klitschko would not have fought Fury without a rematch clause, but also deny that Klitschko would have vacated if Fury refused the rematch clause.

Those two things can't both be true.

So go ahead and call me a bunch of names to try to distract from the fact that your position doesn't make any sense. Other than Loaded Wraps, you don't seem to be fooling anybody.

[aboutfkntime]

You claim Klitschko would not have fought Fury without a rematch clause, but also deny that Klitschko would have vacated if Fury refused the rematch clause.

Those two things can't both be true.

So go ahead and call me a bunch of names to try to distract from the fact that your position doesn't make any sense. Other than Loaded Wraps, you don't seem to be fooling anybody.

Why are you lying kid ?

Those two things obviously CAN both be true, and I have explained why on NUMEROUS occasions.

Crawling up your own ass to hide, is something that little children do.

Stop lying kid !!

Klitschko would NOT have vacated his belts, because the WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch..... just like they have on NUMEROUS other occasions..... SIMPLE!!

You casual fans are clueless.

And you tried to make out that you work in the industry

Come on then, Mr Boxing Insider..... tell us what you do, and who you are.

You are full-of-**** kid, from first post to last.

Stop being so dishonest you lying deceitful clown, you asked a question, and I have answered it on at least FOUR occasions..... at least have the common-decency to acknowledge that fact.

Repeatedly asking a question that has already been answered on NUMEROUS occasions..... is childishly dishonest.

Grow up kid..... oh, and..... STOP LYING !!

Post #223

The WBA/WBO would have deferred their mandatory for the following reasons..... reasons which have already been explained to you, on multiple occasions.

Post #225

Stop lying kid..... the WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch.

Post #227

Stop lying kid..... the WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch.

Post #233

Bull**** kid !!

1) stop lying

2) stop putting words into Klitschko's mouth

3) stop putting words into my mouth, you dishonest clown

#2 Klitschko would NOT have vacated his belts, because the WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch.

STOP LYING KID !!

[original zero]

lots of insults and name calling, but you can't counter my position.

mandatory challengers can't be forced to agree to a rematch clause.

so, IF tyson fury did not agree to a rematch clause, klitschko's choice would be:

FACE FURY OR VACATE.


one or the other. yet, you claim he wouldn't have faced fury and you also claim he wouldn't have vacated.

doesn't make any sense.

[aboutfkntime]

lots of insults and name calling, but you can't counter my position.

mandatory challengers can't be forced to agree to a rematch clause.

so, IF tyson fury did not agree to a rematch clause, klitschko's choice would be:

FACE FURY OR VACATE.


one or the other. yet, you claim he wouldn't have faced fury and you also claim he wouldn't have vacated.

doesn't make any sense.

Your posting has degraded to fanboy/child level.

Any reason why that is ?

STOP LYING KID !!

The WBA/WBO would have allowed the rematch..... and you know it !!

Still telling people that you are a boxing insider to seem intelligent ?

[original zero]

You clearly struggle with basic reading comprehension. Is English not your first language?

You claimed that Klitschko would never have agreed to face Fury unless Fury agreed to a rematch clause.

So, if Fury REFUSED TO AGREE TO A REMATCH CLAUSE, Klitschko's choice would have been to face Fury or vacate.

Why are you having so much trouble understanding something so simple?

[aboutfkntime]

You clearly struggle with basic reading comprehension. Is English not your first language?

You claimed that Klitschko would never have agreed to face Fury unless Fury agreed to a rematch clause.

correct !!

So, if Fury REFUSED TO AGREE TO A REMATCH CLAUSE, Klitschko's choice would have been to face Fury or vacate.

Why are you having so much trouble understanding something so simple?

Why would Fury possibly refuse a rematch clause kid ?

He is not that ******, he wanted the fight.

You stated that the WBA/WBO would have stripped Klitschko.

Now, you are trying to say that Fury would have refused a rematch ?

Don't be so ******, Fury AGREED to a rematch, so why are you attempting to insinuate that he would refuse, you dumbass?

Stop flip-flopping, you dishonest clown.

You stated that the the WBO/WBA would have stripped Klitschko.

But anyone with a little common-sense knows that is simply not true.

So, STOP LYING KID !!

BTW, do you still work within the boxing industry ?

And, do " rules doe " still > common-sense

[original zero]

Had Fury won without a rematch clause, he would have made a lot more for the rematch.

Had Fury won without a rematch clause, he would have been able to keep the IBF title if he wanted to.

You claim Klitschko would have refused to face Fury without a rematch clause.

Which means that if Fury had insisted on enforcing his mandatory position without a rematch clause, Klitschko would have had to vacate two of his titles.

I don't think anybody here but you believes he would have been willing to do that.

Which means you are 100% wrong when you insist Fury wouldn't have gotten a title shot without a rematch clause.

Fury was a DOUBLE MANDATORY. You can't force a mandatory to sign a rematch clause. Klitschko's choice would have been face Fury or vacate.

My position has stayed exactly the same. You accuse me of flip flopping because you don't know how to read.

Yes I still work in the industry. I'm sorry that when rules and laws are explained to you that you prefer to pretend they don't exist.

Rules doe. Kid.