Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: A lot of People, A lot of Fans Think I Beat Mayweather
Collapse
-
-
This guy must be a proponent of the slow motion judging.Rigged score cards, padded compubox and biased judging gave that score card. But the true score card were every punch was documented shows it was 8-4 in favor of the Pac.
Go to my thread. You'll see how pathetic Floyd missed in his punches, good thing Vegas was their to save his ass.Comment
-
-
Oh wait, let me guess, you got nothing else to go on except what OTHER people say?
"But...but...but THEY said he won."
*smh*
I guess you also believe Roach when he said that Floyd could beat GGG, right?Last edited by Mr. Punch-Out!!; 01-21-2016, 10:20 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
You evaded my questions like a b*tch.
You are the one who said no one can explain it, but its clearly been explained multiple times already... the night it happened.
Its been explained on this board a million times already, but you become dumb deaf and blind when you want to be.Comment
-
You keep saying Floyd missed his punches, but you never mention the punches Manny connected on. Why? Because he didn't land too many. And he certainly didn't land more punches than Floyd did. Even if you watch it in super duper high def really really slow motion.Rigged score cards, padded compubox and biased judging gave that score card. But the true score card were every punch was documented shows it was 8-4 in favor of the Pac.
Go to my thread. You'll see how pathetic Floyd missed in his punches, good thing Vegas was their to save his ass.Comment
-
See? That's what I'm talking about right there; you yourself can't explain it so all you can do is rely on what other people say, as if what they say is true (it's not and that even goes for the commentators). There's no actual proof to show why Floyd deserved the win.You evaded my questions like a b*tch
You are the one who said no one can explain it, but its clearly been explained multiple times already... the night it happened.
Its been explained on this board a million times already, but you become dumb deaf and blind when you want to be.
Meanwhile, we have actual videos showing Pacquiao winning and nobody has been able to disprove them. All they can do is go "lol slow mo" like that's an actual argument. But it's not. There's no case for Floyd other than BS scoring and bad judging. It's as simple as that.
Wow, you're either in denial or you didn't even watch the videos.Last edited by Mr. Punch-Out!!; 01-21-2016, 11:09 AM.Comment
-
See? That's what I'm talking about right there; you yourself can't explain it so all you can do is rely on what other people say, as if what they say is true (it's not and that even goes for the commentators). There's no actual proof to show why Floyd deserved the win.
Meanwhile, we have actual videos showing Pacquiao winning and nobody has been able to disprove. All they can do is go "lol slow mo" like that's an actual argument. But it's not. There's proof for Pacquiao and there's none for Floyd. It's simple as that.
...
Yeah, you didn't see the videos where every shot was counted.
Dude... the actual fight when it was first broadcast is proof. Not edited youtube videos.
I have no problem telling you why Floyd won. He kept his jab in Manny's face, outlanded him easily and took away Manny's offense by being physical and dictating the pace. Better offensively, better defensively, by a pretty clear margin. It wasnt a beatdown, it was a boxing match, and Floyd outboxed Manny.
We can do a round by round scorecard if you want. But again, all that has already been done by me and other on this board.Comment


Comment