Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: A lot of People, A lot of Fans Think I Beat Mayweather

[Reloaded]

waaa waaa butthurt.

Doesnt bother me you like being ****** I was only trying to open your mind a little I guess youre not ready .

[Spoon23]

I dont really get why this keeps going on. Those that think manny won are going to no matter what and everyone else wont. Its just arguing in circles. The decision was made, its set, and not even close to being turned over. People just argue just to argue now. No points being made and no opinions being changed.

What you don't get is that this is a sample of the corruption in boxing and it should stop. We boxing fans have been played too many times.. It's time to stop.

[Shogunofharlem1]

What you don't get is that this is a sample of the corruption in boxing and it should stop. We boxing fans have been played too many times.. It's time to stop.

Thats disingenuous. Maybe if it was some huge gap where one fighter blatently got screwed (like we see so many times) then there would be a point. But not this **** tier fight where both guys barely did anything. You dont have a leg to stand on because it doesnt come off as a parade for equality, its a fan mad his favorite guy didnt win over a **** fight that can barely be defended for either fighter (your defense for this fight would come off as **** even if the verdict was the other way around). If you are going to pick a fight to protest, pick one where the majority sees the fight one way and the judges another. If this was Manny Pacquiao-Timothy Bradley 1 than sure but this fight? No way. Which leads to my original statement. You change no ones mind and they dont change yours. Whats the point again? Looks like its just to argue for arguements sake.

[Spoon23]

Thats disingenuous. Maybe if it was some huge gap where one fighter blatently got screwed (like we see so many times) then there would be a point. But not this **** tier fight where both guys barely did anything. You dont have a leg to stand on because it doesnt come off as a parade for equality, its a fan mad his favorite guy didnt win over a **** fight that can barely be defended for either fighter (your defense for this fight would come off as **** even if the verdict was the other way around). If you are going to pick a fight to protest, pick one where the majority sees the fight one way and the judges another. If this was Manny Pacquiao-Timothy Bradley 1 than sure but this fight? No way. Which leads to my original statement. You change no ones mind and they dont change yours. Whats the point again? Looks like its just to argue for arguements sake.

Well it was blatant. Video evidence shows Pac won 8 rounds and one judge gave 2 rounds only. Add the IV gate, the padded compubox. Shows corruption in the biggest scale. But I know you won't get that

[Shogunofharlem1]

Well it was blatant. Video evidence shows Pac won 8 rounds and one judge gave 2 rounds only. Add the IV gate, the padded compubox. Shows corruption in the biggest scale. But I know you won't get that

Its not even close to blatant. This was a bad fight where fighter A barely does much more than fighter B no matter who you chose. And honestly I don't know why I'm arguing because you kinda just see what you want to see. That fight was many things but good was not one of them. Neither was it a domination by either fighter.

[Spoon23]

Everyone knows Floyd didn't concluded anything that night.

From the IV gate to the questionable win..


5 million got robbed with their eyes open in that uneventful night when Floyd wet his panties lol That was the biggest heist in sports history. Road runner vs Willie Kayote is what happened. lol

Day light robbery was in play. And yes Floyd laughed all the way to the bank. He fooled the world.

All that was concluded that night was that Floyd didn't really win, and obviously didn't deserve a single centavo from that pathetic display of marathon boxing.

As we finally see from video evidences Pac did land more than Floyd.

And that's the bottom line.

[Spoon23]

Its not even close to blatant. This was a bad fight where fighter A barely does much more than fighter B no matter who you chose. And honestly I don't know why I'm arguing because you kinda just see what you want to see. That fight was many things but good was not one of them. Neither was it a domination by either fighter.

Yes both connected the least punch output of their careers. But what compubox didn't say, the guy who actually landed more than the other was Pac, since we all know compubox is about effective punches connected per round.

Here's proof, go to my link: compubox was biased for Floyd. Pac outlanded Floyd 8 rounds to 4.

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=695333

If that's not blatant in the biggest event in boxing. Add the IV gate obvious favoritism for Floyd as evidence shows favoritism for the home town boy for receiving a TUE 3 weeks after a fight. Shows the scale of blatant the world has ever seen.

But off course you still won't get it. Anyway, that thread link has 150 plus pages, 37000 views. Read through it, If you still can't believe it's blatant. I can't help you until you remove your horse blinders.

Cheers!

[screwhead1]

Pacquaio has some folks that will back him forever. Cong****, you guys will define his legacy more than he ever did.

[Rath]

Pacquaio has some folks that will back him forever. Cong****, you guys will define his legacy more than he ever did.

he even got a country to back him up.

Floyd can not even made 5 of his neighbors support him.

genius floyd fans are too jealous of that.

man of color are not supported by red white and blue boo hoo hoo

[Spoon23]

Pacquaio has some folks that will back him forever. Cong****, you guys will define his legacy more than he ever did.

Just giving what's due to the one who rightfully deserves it.

And oh, in any athlete, he will always be defined by the fans. They tell the whole legacy of a fighter. But what's important is they are defined by evidences that support the whole truth and nothing but the truth

Fake wins don't count.