Did the Ref F'd Up In The Martin vs Glazkov?

[.!WAR MIKEY!.]

Glazkov went down from a injury before the 4th round and he beat the count and technically the kd wasnt from a punch

the ref counted and Glazkov beat the count shouldent the ref had then take Glazkov to the doc to see if he can continue (doc ruled he had a torn acl)

think about it, first KD was a slip and second KD wasnt caused by a punch. so it was basically a injury and that is a No Contest before the 4th round.

[-PBP-]

The way I understand it is if you can't continue due to injury you lose by TKO. If the injury is caused by a foul it's a no contest.

[Derranged]

The way I understand it is if you can't continue due to injury you lose by TKO. If the injury is caused by a foul it's a no contest.

Aye, sounds right

[paulf]

The way I understand it is if you can't continue due to injury you lose by TKO. If the injury is caused by a foul it's a no contest.

Wouldn't it be a DQ if a fighter cant continue as result of a foul?

NC if its stopped before the fifth round, yeah? AFter that you score what ya got?

[-PBP-]

Wouldn't it be a DQ if a fighter cant continue as result of a foul?

NC if its stopped before the fifth round, yay? AFter that you score what ya got?

Hopkins/Dawson 1 was a no contest.

[walrusthewill]

It seemed to me the ref asked him if he wanted to continue, and he shook his head no

[about.thousands]

Glazkov went down from a injury before the 4th round and he beat the count and technically the kd wasnt from a punch

the ref counted and Glazkov beat the count shouldent the ref had then take Glazkov to the doc to see if he can continue (doc ruled he had a torn acl)

think about it, first KD was a slip and second KD wasnt caused by a punch. so it was basically a injury and that is a No Contest before the 4th round.

PBC/Haymon has two HW champs

[FeFist]

Hopkins/Dawson 1 was a no contest.

The referee didn't call it a foul (you can hear him say as much) and he called it a TKO in Dawson's favour. It was then changed to a No Contest; I don't think they would have been able to change it to a win for Bernard, even if they viewed the incident as a foul after the fight.

If a fight stops because of a foul, I think the perpetrator would be disqualified. A no contest would result from an accident stopping the fight before the end of the 4th round.

[SilverMiles]

Seems to be a case by case basis. Whoever has the must money makes the rules up. Hopkins vs Dawson no contest because Hopkins was with GBP. Martin vs Glazvok most likely stays a no contest because Martin is with Haymon.

[SlySlickSmooth]

The way I understand it is if you can't continue due to injury you lose by TKO. If the injury is caused by a foul it's a no contest.

Yep. This is also the same thing that was discussed with the Jacobs-Mora fight when Mora got injured coincidentally with a grazing punch being part of the question.