Originally posted by DreamerUSA
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Has there been a fighter who did less than GGG to be considered top 5 p4p
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by TheUntouchable View PostWhy do you care so much about an imaginary bull**** list?
Ranking all those guys from different weight divisions, what for? Most boxers (including all those guys you mentioned and Floyd and Manny and ...) never fight the best out of their own weight class, why even bother thinking about a ranking for all weight classes?
There's so much talking about who should be P4P #1, 2, 3, 4, ..., 100, who's A-Side, B-Side, X-Side, all those absurd rankings are for nothing, fans should demand the best fights and not troll each other with all that bs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheUntouchable View PostWhy make 100 threads about a boxer you don't like?
I give credit where its due and criticism as well. People need to get out of their feelings. This is a boxing forum where you are supposed to voice your opinon not a place to meet and agree on everything or insult someone who doesn't agree with you
Comment
-
GGG has benefitted greatly from the HBO hype machine and HBO's partnership with ESPN. HIs resume IMO is not p4p worthy even though skillwise I believe he is just a notch below the elite-Floyd, ward, rigo, JMM and power wise he is elite.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostGGG has benefitted greatly from the HBO hype machine and HBO's partnership with ESPN. HIs resume IMO is not p4p worthy even though skillwise I believe he is just a notch below the elite-Floyd, ward, rigo, JMM and power wise he is elite.summed it all up
Comment
-
The reality is such that there is not a clear set of top fighters. I would rank GGG in my top 5, but that's probably because I can't really find 5 fighters that clearly deserve to be above him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BrometheusBob View PostThe reality is such that there is not a clear set of top fighters. I would rank GGG in my top 5, but that's probably because I can't really find 5 fighters that clearly deserve to be above him.
Comment
-
People take gggs amateur career as well as evidence of how good he is its the whole package. If you was an amateur star and have great form as a pro you are basically a sure bet. Whereas if you have no amateur pedigree but do well as a pro you may be thought of as a flash in the pan and can be exposed any moment.
When PAC was beating barera, morales and jmm it bwas clear to everyone PAC had fought higher calibre opponents but Floyd was considered no1 by ring magazine.?Last edited by hugh grant; 01-14-2016, 07:57 PM.
Comment
Comment