mandatory or not. if the champion wants a rematch clause encase he loses then it should be apart of the fight contract.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Haye Feels Validated With Fury's "Mistake" of Rematch Clause
Collapse
-
comical how Haye with no career has opinions to give
Davey haye with no career and no respect in boxing has opinions and advice for everyone in boxing. Haye has done little and is laughed at for being more of a clown and wild Samoan looking deranged misfit that a boxing spokesperson. Haye obviously has a few screws loose.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bluebeam View PostMandatories are not obligated to do a rematch clause.
Haye is saying that if fury wouldn't have agreed to the rematch clause he could have dictated the terms of the rematch.
Being that he accepted the rematch clause, the terms were already locked in for a rematch if wlad lost.
So basically fury could have made more money in a rematch without the rematch clause.
That's all haye is saying.
And its always speculative on future dealings. I think it breaks down like this: he probably would have gotten more money on a 1 fight agreement for the rematch if he won, but he'd probably have walked away with less if he had loss so its a gamble either way to some extent, but the way he went seems like the more profitable route vs most fights vs guys who haven't lost in 11 years on fighting on their turf.
Seems like he took the win win option to me cuz he supposedly got $5.5M for the first fight & if he got guaranteed lets say $8M-$12M for a rematch if he won its a better deal than if he'd have gotten $3M without the rematch clause how much more would he have been able to get extra without the rematch agreement? Idk, but I know $5.5M is better than $3M for money up front in particular for a guy who's digs living in a caravan.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bluebeam View PostMandatories are not obligated to do a rematch clause.
Haye is saying that if fury wouldn't have agreed to the rematch clause he could have dictated the terms of the rematch.
Being that he accepted the rematch clause, the terms were already locked in for a rematch if wlad lost.
So basically fury could have made more money in a rematch without the rematch clause.
That's all haye is saying.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Weebler I View PostHaye is just talking and talking at this point, none of what he says stands up to logic.
Klitschko rematch is the biggest money fight out there. Joshua isn't ready and Haye isn't reliable.
Comment
Comment