Comments Thread For: Haye Feels Validated With Fury's "Mistake" of Rematch Clause

[Larry the boss]

I doubt Fury was ever getting a fight with the controlkos without a rematch clause! Fury needed that fight and needed to walk into Vlad's kitchen to do it...that has always been the way the Klits negotiate.

He was mandatory for 2 of Wlads titles

[ShoulderRoll]

I don't like David Haye all that much but he is right about this. Fury was the mandatory and Klitschko had to fight him regardless of a rematch clause or not.

Fury could have defended against that clod Glazkov, got an easy win and some nice money, then put the screws to Klit in negotiations for the rematch.

[LoadedWraps]

Haye >>>> Fury KO 3.

[SlySlickSmooth]

No opinion on the money-side of it but an immediate rematch is something I favor as a fan for a fight of this magnitude.. especially for the Heavyweight crown.

[Jewish-Reptile]

Haye signed a rematch clause himself did he not when he faced Klitschko, I'm sure I remember him harping on about contracts that he had to rematch then if he won he was obligated to face big brother, trying to embarrass K2 whilst he was at it but all he did was embarrass himself and all his fans with his inept performance. Most of Haye's fans abandoned him immediately but their were still a few who clung to his picture of his naked buttocks in the jungle to cry themselves to sleep every time Wlad defended Haye's former WBA belt which he absorbed.

[ragingbull1]

Hoping Demori sparks this clown and that will be the last we see of him (probably wont). The mans had a painful divorce after years of cheating on his wife..... now he's skint and needs a comeback! Stop living like a playboy. Big up channel Dave for getting involved though.

[Ray*]

Even doe" Haye isnt my cup of tea at the moment, have got to question Team Fury decision here, i didnt know he was the mandatory for TWO of the belts. Even in losing Wlad is still in control of the rematch, that shouldnt have happen if you lost your belt to a mandatory challenger, if it was a voluntary defence then yeah fine but not when you are a mandatory to TWO belts.